Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is Cory Booker really that stupid? Or is he typical of the residents of the formerly great state of New Jersey?

This is what I found:
[b]“I sit here right now because when good white people in this country heard bigotry or hatred, they stood up,” Booker began. “What went on in the White House, what went on in the Oval Office, is profoundly disturbing to me.”

He then began to criticize Nielsen’s claim that she doesn’t remember what Trump said in the Oval Office or whether the president used the term “shithole.”

“I’ve been in the Oval Office many times and when the commander in chief speaks, I listen. I don’t have amnesia on conversations in the Oval Office going back months and months and months,” Booker said.

"Why am I seething with anger?” Booker asked, “We have this incredible nation where we’ve been taught it doesn’t matter where you’re from, it doesn’t matter your color, your race, your religion, it’s about the content of your character. It’s about your values and your ideas. And yet we have language that from Dick Durbin to Lindsay Graham — they seem to have a much better recollection of what went on. You’re under oath.”

Booker continued, choking back tears. “You and others in that room that suddenly cannot remember. It was Martin Luther King that said, ‘There’s nothing in this world that’s more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.’ And so, here we are in the United States of America. And we have a history that is beautiful and grand, and also ugly — where from this nation to others, we know what happens when people sit by and are bystanders and say nothing,” he said

“Our greatest heroes in this country, spoke out about people who have convenient amnesia or who are bystanders,” Booker told Nielsen, quoting King, Elie Wiesel, Gandhi.

This idea that the commander in chief of this country could with broad brushes talk about certain nations and thus cast a shadow over the millions of American who are from those communities — and that you could even say in your testimony that Norwegians were [preferred] by him because they were ‘so hard working….

Your silence and amnesia are complicity,” he said, looking directly at Nielsen. “When Dick Durbin called me, I had tears of rage when I heard about his experience in that meeting, and for you not to feel that hurt and that pain and to dismiss some of the questions of my colleagues, saying, ‘I’ve already answered that line of questions,’ when tens of millions of Americans are hurting right now because they’re worried about what happened in the White House… that’s unacceptable to me..."[/b]
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
Yes, I seem to recall that the President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, segregated the military, and all civil services. Funny how that escapes the scrutiny of the esteemed members of the democrat party.
@sunsporter1649 So it’s totally about party for you ? Wasn’t Truman also a Democrat ? He’s the fellow who desegregated the troops. But good dodge.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
I see, you are a registered Independent and never vote any party line.
He's anti-racist. Did he upset [b]your[/b] klavern ? 🙄
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson Hahahahaha. You don't belong in any sentence with the word "objective". 😉
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
No need to take out your frustration on me 😀 @windinhishair
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Oh oh, now they are jumping on you, my friend. I do apologise.
room101 · 51-55, M
Anybody who can't see that what Booker said was totally appropriate and necessary is just as racist as the moron in chief.

[b][i]“The commander in chief, in an Oval Office meeting, referring to people from African countries and Haitians with the most vile and vulgar language — that language festers,” Booker said. “When ignorance and bigotry is alive with power, it’s a dangerous force in our country. Your silence and your amnesia is complicity.”[/i][/b]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Your OBLIVIOUSNESS should scare you. @room101
room101 · 51-55, M
@jackjjackson and your idiocy scares all that come into contact with you.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Oh? Please tell us more. @room101
SW-User
He offended all the feminist w/ his excessive mansplaining.
ladycae · 100+, F
@sunsporter1649 i never said a word about my personal thoughts on Clinton or rice. how quick you are to assume. typical troll
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Be careful. That one blocked me awhile ago after being frustrated with logic 😀 @sunsporter1649
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@jackjjackson Yes, logic does frustrate them, makes my day brighter.
room101 · 51-55, M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXgvW1pB8KI]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
[image deleted]@room101
ladycae · 100+, F
@room101 hahahahahahahaha i love him he is always funny but also tells the truth
room101 · 51-55, M
@ladycae tells the truth? what truth would that be?
fairone · F
I know Cory... haven't had the pleasure of his company in several years.. What did he do?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@fairone Read the speech he gave today.
fairone · F
@sunsporter1649 will do! Thanks
katielass · F
He's that stupid.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@katielass Also over acting badly
katielass · F
@HoraceGreenley Yes, just a little too much drama. #fake outrage
room101 · 51-55, M
@katielass the fake outrage is the same fake crap that all trumpettes always display when caught in the headlights
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
#grandstanding
katielass · F
@jackjjackson He should have saved that little drama for meryl streep. She was complicit in the rape of that rose woman since she chose to remain silent. COMPLICIT! Yes, that was the word he used.
katielass · F
@jackjjackson i thought of it more as his way of telling blacks how they are supposed to see it.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
I thought he was telling everyone how they should see it. @katielass
Before I block you I am confirming you were ignorant.

 
Post Comment