People are offended by a gay character in the new Beauty and the Beast?

Right? I just don't get it. He's the only gay person in the entire movie and the "gay scene" was him dancing with another guy. How is that even remotely pushing an agenda? It's called inclusivity, but apparently some people are allergic to that.

It's pure homophobia plain and simple. @Killers:

@doctorlove: I accidently deleted his comment so here it is for reference:

[center][image deleted][/center]

1.) What snake oil, quack doctor studies are you citing, because the studies I found show that homosexual parents are just as capable of raising a happy, healthy child as heterosexual parents. Many studies I found say that two parents are ideal, but the sex of the parents is fairly irrelevant because women can be masculine and men can be feminine.

Links:
[b]+[/b] https://qz.com/438469/the-science-is-clear-children-raised-by-same-sex-parents-are-at-no-disadvantage/
[b]+[/b] http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/15/health/health-of-children-with-same-sex-parents/
[b]+[/b] http://www.livescience.com/17913-advantages-gay-parents.html
[b]+[/b] https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/02/using-pseudoscience-to-undermine-same-sex-parents/385604/

2.) No, homosexual relationships are not a "biological perversion". They are present in many other species, and unlike humans, those species don't berate and discriminate against their homosexual brethren.

3.) You're heavily implying that homosexuality is a "problem" or a health concern similar to obesity. That's comparing apples to oranges. Homosexuality between two consenting adults hurts nobody, and is none of your damn business. They don't need help. [b]YOU[/b] need help.

4.) Jack off to Breitbart, and fuck off from here, buddy-o.

[center][/center]