Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What ever happened to

All the great SWers that were promoting jabs and busy refuting anyone who spoke in favor of not getting jabbed? They were a constant menace to anyone who dared question the official narrative. Bar graphs and cut and paste for hours trying to debunk the idea that we humans have a natural immune system that works. Where did they all go? All I see now are people laughing at the pro vaxers and no pro vaxer is rising to the fight! Did the non vaxers really win the debate because time not experts showed everyone that being pro nature was best after all?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pherick · 41-45, M
Nothing left to promote. If you understand the science, you got them, if you didn't ... Well you can only argue with one so long before you realize it's just not really worth it.

No one is laughing at pro vaxers, you are just making that up.

Take care.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick Hahahahahahahaha... You still sipping that koolaide? Every piece of data available now indicates exactly the opposite.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Oh really? I can't wait to see that data. Please post everything you have.

I will wait ...
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick If you haven't seen it you have both eyes firmly shut. The UK, Canada, Australia all indicate that they are seeing an increase in cases among the vaxed and a very sharp decrease among the unvaxed. Some experts say it is a form of VAIDS as the increase in sickness goes up with the number of jabs you have received. Sadly you have closed your eyes and likely shortened your life as a result. Kind of sucks to be you. I had delta in October. It was a very mild cold. Three of my vaxed friends had omicron in March They were really sick and one was hospitalized. None of my unvaxed friends had so much as a sniffle.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Interesting anecdotal evidence, which of course means nothing.

Could you post actual scientific studies or articles that back up your claims?
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick You can find them all over the web. If you can't find them I won't bother posting them. You choose not to look.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 So you don't have any sources? Figured as much.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick If you haven't seen information by now you are too braindead to even discuss. BTW here is a clue. Anecdotal information is often a good way to refute data. If you are reading a set of data that shows all the rocks in the world falling up but every time you drop a rock it falls down you have a very strong case to doubt the data you are examining. If the officials are saying that only the unvaxed are getting sick but you see only the vaxed are sick it is very likely that the official data is fake. Yes officials fake data all the time. Look at AGW. It has been predicted since the 1980s but still hasn't happened despite all the official deadlines that we should be able to prove or disprove. The official source says that Manhattan is under 10' of water. Anecdotal evidence shows that Manhattan is dry. Which do you chose to believe?
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 LOL Dear god man, anecdotal information is the EXACT opposite of what you are saying. Jesus christ, get a fucking clue man, you are beyond help.

There is a big and distinct difference between anecdotal evidence and scientific evidence, or proof based on findings from systematic observation, measurement, and experimentation. While scientific evidence can be independently verified using the scientific method, anecdotal evidence cannot.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick Nope. You have a very twisted view of what is true and false is a joke. You refuse to look for official data that might counter your narrative even though in your own life experience you see more vaxed sick than unvaxed. Very strange and twisted mental state you exist in. Oh well. Sad you refuse to look and analyze.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 You present the hypothesis, then you present the data that backs it up. It's debate 101 man. It's honestly not that tough.

With all the yapping you have done so far, you could have posted 1000 links to your data.

Still don't see any of it.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick Then prove me wrong by finding actual current evidence. That is the scientific method if you were not aware.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 LOL no its not.

You don't get to come onto the stage and declare "The world is flat" with no proof and then demand that I find information that proves you wrong. You come on stage say "The world is flat and here is all my data and proof" and then I take all that and try and refute it. THATS how this works if you were not aware.

Come on dude, you honestly can't believe anything that stupid.

You make a statement, YOU back it up with facts. This isn't hard bud.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick If you don't know how the scientific method works..... We will just leave it at that. Your data is so far out of date as to be a joke. Even Walgreens is noting that that among the covid sufferers the safest are the unvaxed based on their own data and they make money selling vaxes.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 Walgreens? Sounds like you have some data ....

If only you would post it ...

Here is a great little diagram for you, it should help you get there. https://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/science-fair/steps-of-the-scientific-method
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick Why don't you go read the Pfizer docs. There are 80,000 pages available. Just reading a FOI request in Australia that points out that the risk of miscarriage for pregnant women is 1517% higher if she gets vaxed while pregnant.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 I would love to.

You should totally link to it, perhaps the exact parts that prove your theory. Otherwise, you are, as always, full of hot air.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick If you can't run a search engine....... TOO FUNNY!!! you keep beclowning yourself!!!!!
Pherick · 41-45, M
@hippyjoe1955 As always, not my job to prove your theories. Whenever you actually want to try again and have real data to share, drop me a line.

Later bud.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@Pherick If you can't run a search engine....... you are interested in learning a thing. You have your mind made up so I won't confuse you with facts.