Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Sympatize People With Gigantomastia

If you know me, you know that I have written quite extensively on macromastia--both from my own experience and from the experiences of my macro friends.

Here I would like to write about reduction surgery. A common suggestion that macro women often hear is, "Why don't you ('just'--as though it's an easy decision) have surgery to get your breasts reduced?" I have myself heard this many times over the years and if it is not said forthrightly, it is STRONGLY suggested. The first thing I want to say is that the decision to have a reduction is an intensely personal one. I do not want to have reduction surgery and I will resist having it as long as possible. My reasons are many and I will not go into them here. If you follow my SW writings on macromastia, you can probably find them in one of my earlier posts. However, if a friend of mine elects to have reduction surgery, I will support her decision fully. Every macro woman has her own unique circumstances and her own personal struggles. I have absolutely no authority to tell her what she should do because I have not walked in her shoes. My only admonition to my friend is that she thoroughly research the subject, talk to others about their surgical experiences, and think/pray long and hard before jumping at the procedure. There are many doctors who are convinced that the only viable treatment for macromastia is to dramatically reduce the mass of the breasts through surgery. But there are many irreversible effects of such surgery that are not often shared with the woman and her family. All of these aspects need to be completely aired and discussed.

The other issue I want to mention is the incredibly convoluted and frustrating experience that many macro women have with their medical insurance providers. Way too many insurers put a woman through bureaucratic hell to receive insurance approval for reduction operations. This is just not acceptable. A woman--often an underage female--who has suffered through the medical pain and social indignities of macromastia should not have to tolerate the unconscionable reluctance of insurance companies to cover ANY part of their treatment, let alone reduction surgery. My advice to the woman who finds herself in this fix is to make absolutely certain that your doctor will support you fully and in writing and will be willing to jump through all the hoops that insurers demand before they will pay. Have a trusted and persistent family member or friend who has dealt with insurers before handle the heavy lifting for you. You have suffered enough. You should not have to engage insurance companies in prolonged battles as well.

With regard to national health insurance departments like those in either the United Kingdom or Canada, you especially have my sympathies. The limited contact I have had with macro women in those countries indicates to me that it is VERY difficult to get national health insurers ("single payers") to assent to reduction surgery. The tendency of those outfits is to resist and deny interminably which makes a bad situation numerous times worse for the macro sufferer. For many macro women, the election to have surgery is NOT a mere cosmetic determination, but relates directly to the woman's health and quality of life.

So, if you are macro and are considering reduction surgery, please explore all your medical options thoroughly and extensively, and may God bless you in whatever decision you believe is right for you! 🙂
doodlebug2013 · 41-45, F
I think what torks me off most about the why don't you "just" 😒 question is how whoever's asking just assumes they have some claim to a say in it. Poking their nose in like they have a right to it. Yeah, my relationship with my body is complicated, but it's MINE.

Everybody's different. For me, saying my likelihood of life threatening complications after any kind of surgery that's higher than most people has shut them up when I've gotten that question. But it's ridiculous I've ever answered it in the first place. And it's upsetting too because it reminds me maybe there is a choice for somebody else but I don't realistically have it.
doodlebug2013 · 41-45, F
No clue if I spelled that right, but I say it all the time!
veeceekay1991 · 31-35, F
@doodlebug2013 Well, I sure wouldn't want to tork you off! Lol.
Guidence · 46-50, M
@doodlebug2013 I have a Type 2 diabetic friend who has had to go the ER a few times. She has a meme of Willy Wonka saying "Yes, please tell me how simple this is to cure or live with"
It says it all.
"Nothing is impossible for those who do not have to do it" - shows they do not understand.
Please do not feel trapped nor loose hope. I kinda heard that in you post. Doing things and living life with this is not easy, just worth it. Worth getting out - safely.
(Another ignorant response?)
I was at Sci Fi con and one of the Geek comedians was Dolly Parton large. She was on state. People laughed at her jokes and I did not see her get harassed, joked nor stared at. We had a couple of voice actors and another star there so she went unnoticed at times. Real fact.
First off, hopefully nobody replies wanting to perv on the fact that some women have breasts that are, yes, large but far too large for comfort.

As a nudist I see and know and have relationships with plenty of women that struggle in this area. Other than medical solutions, what is there? I know perhaps diet and exercise can help but I do know several women personally who are very fit but still suffer from this.
veeceekay1991 · 31-35, F
@NerdyNudist Yes, it's true that if the end goal of the woman is to have smaller breasts, then surgery is the only path open to her. The only alternative is to keep the breasts as they are and learn to live with them.

My post was prompted by someone on SW who was recently told that her request that medical insurance cover her reduction surgery was denied in favor of breast reduction by "natural means." This is an absolutely idiotic statement composed by someone who has NO idea what macromastia is and what it does to the mammary tissue. In a true macro woman, neither exercise nor diet will achieve more than a miniscule reduction of size. The reason: macro women have what is called in medical circles, "dense breast tissue." This means that the overwhelming predominance of breast mass is connective tissue NOT fat. Exercise and/or diet will only reduce--to a very minor extent--the fatty tissue in the breast, not the connective tissue.

Who knows what this faceless bureaucrat meant by "natural means?" Should the macro woman place her breasts out in the hot sun and hope they shrivel like raisins? It might be this or something as equally ridiculous.
@veeceekay1991 That's very interesting. It seems insurance is lacking behind medical science or simply doesn't want to acknowledge breast reduction as a valid procedure for health.
Guidence · 46-50, M
@veeceekay1991 "Diet" is the first ignorant comment.
That does not work. Hormones, not hot dogs, are driving breast growth.
I understand it is hard to make a case for pain when women are getting L or O cup implants.
However - why is easier for a woman to get labiaplasty than breast reduction and counseling ? Counseling pre and post operation.

It seems backwards for some insurances cover labiaplasty and some British doctors are booked solid yet breast reduction and scar removal is hard to come by. I hate to say macromastia is a real problem. Both are. Macromastia is just a more critical one. Please do post advice and give people a heads up.

Also note: sadly high school girls can get the labiaplasty, which is what created the report I read. It was in a British medical journal for those who are wondering. I would not have thought to search the internet. Fact is stranger than fiction or internet stories.
BookOfSouls85 · 36-40, M
In the UK, Private Health providers (Spire, Circle, Nuffield, BUPA, Virgin Health) offer this service but at a premium.

It is possible that the NHS might do this, but they will make you wait months (if not years). I had to wait a year for a hip operation, and their attitude was 'oh but you should be grateful we're even giving a toss about you'.

As for the comment about 'natural means' - it's probably by some bubble-land and reality-void idiot mouthing off. Probably thinks we all live on Champagne and Quail's Eggs.
needsmilk808 · 56-60, M
I would not pretend to understand what it's like to have macro, but surgery I know all to well. I would never never approached without extensive research and advice. All to often women are encouraged without full disclosure of the potential risks and dangers. If you manage to make it through the surgery successfully there's still the risk of complication or irreversible effects.
Please be very careful.
HeatherFlorida · 36-40, F
Thanks for your unique perspective on this!
Bryguy5446 · 41-45, M
So what happens if you do get your breasts reduced only for them to come back?
melbeacher · 56-60, M
Very well written
BigGuy2 · 26-30, M
Nice and comprehensive
BigGuy2 · 26-30, M
Don’t move on

 
Post Comment