Alternative shooter scenario

Imagine a world where Donny’s shooter was immune from prosecution for shooting Donny. That would have meant the secret service agents who shot him would he guilty of shooting an innocent shooter.

Does that sound preposterous to you? Why would it be preposterous? Donny senior wants full immunity from all crimes committed and all things being equal if full immunity is good enough for the President then why can’t everyone else have full immunity for all crimes committed?

What’s fair for one should apply to all.