Top | Newest First | Oldest First
IronHamster · 56-60, M
I will argue, while I oppose largesse, we must support Ukraine. This isn't Putin's first war of expansion. This is his nineth. He's not stopping at Ukraine. He's consolidating it if possible. By the time he meets his goals he will have four more countries absorbed. This is about Russia's survival and ability to defend itself and therefore Putin's own political survival.
Let me take that a step further. We saw the 40 mile convoy stop for lack of food, and the Russian soldiers hoof it to Belarus for lack of food. When this bad planning creates an opening for NATO troops, and it will, and Putin lacks visibility which will also happen, he will see no choice but to ratchet this up to a nuclear exchange.
Let me take that a step further. We saw the 40 mile convoy stop for lack of food, and the Russian soldiers hoof it to Belarus for lack of food. When this bad planning creates an opening for NATO troops, and it will, and Putin lacks visibility which will also happen, he will see no choice but to ratchet this up to a nuclear exchange.
View 2 more replies »
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@IronHamster Ukraine can never win, the odds are too great, all the stories about Ukraine winning are false, they are simply there to extract more money from the west, most of the money gets laundered back to America, the military industrial complex, to stop Ukraine soldiers dying, the only way is peace, the narrative about Russia expanding is bull shit, it’s all about the west breaking up Russia and stealing its wealth, that is all,
IronHamster · 56-60, M
@ididntknow I support that any politician or whose family is receiving more than one dollar of kickbacks must fight on the front line for one year per occurrence. I want that codified in law.
IronHamster · 56-60, M
@ididntknow As for the rest, it's your opinion. Don't get upset about things you can't change.