This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
asnorkler · 70-79, M
I believe it's rather arrogant of us to assume we know for sure when there are no facts to support either argument. Our beliefs, either way, are simply a matter of faith.
The more adamant we are, the more arrogant!
The more adamant we are, the more arrogant!
asnorkler · 70-79, M
@suzie1960 Proven is the key word!
Probabilities aren't proof either and our inability to comprehend beyond our realm are an equal probaility.
Better minds than ours are detecting evidence of intelligent design simply because even the big bang theory is full of holes.
Begging the question is a fallacy btw
Probabilities aren't proof either and our inability to comprehend beyond our realm are an equal probaility.
Better minds than ours are detecting evidence of intelligent design simply because even the big bang theory is full of holes.
Begging the question is a fallacy btw
suzie1960 · 61-69, F
@asnorkler Even better minds reject the creation hypothesis. No scientist claims the Big Bang Theory is complete but the holes are being filled. If you want to try to fill those holes with a creator, you need to explain where that creator came from and why the universe could not have come into being the same way.
I don't understand your reference to [i]petitio principii[/i] or "begging the question". There is as much evidence for the existence of the Invisible Pink Unicorn as there is for the christian god.
I don't understand your reference to [i]petitio principii[/i] or "begging the question". There is as much evidence for the existence of the Invisible Pink Unicorn as there is for the christian god.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.