How often do you find yourself debating on here?

Rarely now coz it's a waste of time

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

GwydionFrost · 56-60, M

Once a claim is made, I ask for the verifiable proof. This requires all pronouns to be defined (the mysterious "they" responsible for all the worlds' woes, prime example), and all claims to have multiple reliable sources ("I read it on a Facebook meme" is instant failure in my opinion). If my opponent is more interested in name calling or insulting me, rather than discuss the topic they themselves brought up....? That's the sign they have no first hand experience with it or nothing personal to add to the misinformation they are preaching as truth.

Wash my hands-- walk away, without looking back.

SW-User

@GwydionFrost: Ah! A critical thinker! How refreshing!

GwydionFrost · 56-60, M

@Meowsolini: Thank you! Hard to find fans of critical thinking and logic and reason. You'd think there would be more practitioners and fans, since the rules that govern them are equal to all... ;)

okaybut · 56-60, M

@GwydionFrost: I find the same issue. Unfortunately when I ask for proof, they give me a subjective quote somewhat unrelated and when I discount it, inform me I am off topic. Or give a sweeping generalization coming from personal emotions stated as truth. What I find in general (note that term "in general") many (note that term "many") people of the left political spectrum think with their emotions as opposed to reason. I have just stated a broad generalizing statement and other than personal experience I cannot back it up, so in a debate if someone gave me facts I would adjust accordingly (I only wish this on my other debate participants - often to know avail) - what they think is what is true.

GwydionFrost · 56-60, M

@okaybut: This totally reminds me of a study I just heard about on NPR... where humans have amazing skills to solve complicated word problems... until you change the topic to a political hot button. Then, a bizarre effect occurs-- that political bias actually interferes with a person's ability to solve the equation correctly unless the solution already matches their political disposition.

Screw it-- here's the proof (LOL):
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/09/new-study-politics-makes-you-innumerate/