This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ProfessorClitinrub · 100+, M
This is the kind of thing that blows my freaking mind and pisses me off a bit. A person makes a statement on an anonymous website and people assume it's true.
Damn people. Take a freaking second and LOOK IT UP before you form an opinion.
I said it below but I'll say it again. This rule is ONLY for people who are flying as United employees. Anyone else can wear leggings.
I wonder why "fake news" was so effective?
Damn people. Take a freaking second and LOOK IT UP before you form an opinion.
I said it below but I'll say it again. This rule is ONLY for people who are flying as United employees. Anyone else can wear leggings.
I wonder why "fake news" was so effective?
bijouxbroussard · F
It's also been reported by People.com, Snope.com. , New York Daily News, Time.com, us magazine.com, fox6now.com...several out there.
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
@bijouxbroussard: and they pretty much quoted exactly what has been reported- read it
ProfessorClitinrub · 100+, M
@bijouxbroussard: Again, I posted the piece from WaPo in which United says the policy is ONLY for people traveling as United employees or family. EVERY airline has a dress code policy and it's at their discretion if they allow someone to board.
ProfessorClitinrub · 100+, M
@Makemeluvit: Our regular passengers are not going to be denied boarding because they are wearing leggings or yoga pants,” Guerin said. “But when flying as a pass traveler, we require this pass travelers to follow rules, and that is one of those rules.
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
I looked it up already- I fact check the shit outta this place lolz
ProfessorClitinrub · 100+, M
@Makemeluvit: Right ON! Gotta' consider the source of everything. Every time.
bijouxbroussard · F
@Makemeluvit: And that is why I asked for clarification.
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
You replied to a comment that already included the clarification- that is why I pointed it out
bijouxbroussard · F
@Makemeluvit: I merely added more information. All of those sources have reported this story.
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
If you read beyond the headlines then you wouldn't need clarification
bijouxbroussard · F
@Makemeluvit: I don't need your assessment of what I need, that's for certain. Goodbye, now.
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
Lolz people get so defensive on this site that in and of itself is entertaining- if you perceived that I was assessing your needs so be it- that says more about you then it does me ✌🏼
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
Exactly 7 comments up 👆🏼
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
[image/video deleted]
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
Weird that I assumed she needed clarification right?
ProfessorClitinrub · 100+, M
@Makemeluvit: (She's actually a very sharp woman. Maybe some miscommunication in this thread).
bijouxbroussard · F
@ProfessorClitinrub: Thank you for that, anyway. I was actually trying to bow out peacefully and avoid further conflict. 🙂
Makemeluvit · 36-40, F
I don't know what conflict is- I don't let things on here get to me enough to bother labeling it- as far as responding, I have no problem continuing to calmly respond while clarifying why I made the point that I did- maybe there was miscommunication- maybe the peaceful bowing out wasn't meant to sound defensive and dismissive at all- benefit of the doubt