DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Homelessness exists because there is no constitutional humanitarian rights in the constitution.
The whole constitution was based around capitalism. And why there is that ⅗ths clause about slaves.
The main tenets for capitalism were first published in 1776, yet were around before that.
AI analysis of my statement...
The whole constitution was based around capitalism. And why there is that ⅗ths clause about slaves.
The main tenets for capitalism were first published in 1776, yet were around before that.
AI analysis of my statement...
Understanding the Links Between Homelessness and Constitutional Rights
Homelessness is a complex issue influenced by various societal, economic, and political factors. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee certain humanitarian rights, examining its historical context can help clarify its influence on current social issues like homelessness.
Capitalism and Constitutional Framework
The U.S. Constitution was indeed framed during a time when capitalism was emerging as a dominant economic system. Its structure primarily emphasizes property rights and the protection of individual liberties, which can indirectly contribute to socioeconomic disparities.
Property Rights: The Constitution protects property rights, emphasizing individual ownership, which shapes economic behavior and resource allocation. This fundamental principle can sometimes overlook the needs of vulnerable populations.
The Three-Fifths Compromise: This clause allowed states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for legislative representation, reflecting a compromise between slave-holding and non-slave-holding states. It highlights deep-rooted inequalities and illustrates how the founding documents often failed to recognize universal human rights.
Humanitarian Rights in the Constitution
The absence of explicit humanitarian rights—such as housing, healthcare, and social safety nets—has led to debates about the social contract in the U.S. While some elements in the Constitution outline some rights (like free speech and assembly), a comprehensive framework addressing basic human needs is lacking.
Evolving Rights: Over the years, various amendments and interpretations have aimed to expand civil rights, but these efforts often fall short of addressing systemic issues like homelessness.
Judicial Interpretations: Courts have sometimes recognized a right to shelter, but these rulings vary widely. The lack of a constitutional guarantee often leaves homeless individuals with limited legal recourse.
Historical Context of Capitalism
Capitalism as an economic system indeed became more defined around the late 18th century, particularly through works like Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" published in 1776. However, elements of capitalist thought date back to earlier economic theorists and practices.
Pre-Constitutional Capitalism: Concepts of trade, market economy, and property rights existed prior to the Constitution, reflecting the evolving nature of economic systems.
Conclusion
The connection between the Constitution, capitalism, and homelessness is multifaceted. While the Constitutional framework supports individual rights tied to capitalism, it often neglects the humanitarian rights essential for addressing systemic issues like homelessness. Understanding these historical and structural factors can provide insight into the ongoing challenges faced by vulnerable populations.
Homelessness is a complex issue influenced by various societal, economic, and political factors. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly guarantee certain humanitarian rights, examining its historical context can help clarify its influence on current social issues like homelessness.
Capitalism and Constitutional Framework
The U.S. Constitution was indeed framed during a time when capitalism was emerging as a dominant economic system. Its structure primarily emphasizes property rights and the protection of individual liberties, which can indirectly contribute to socioeconomic disparities.
Property Rights: The Constitution protects property rights, emphasizing individual ownership, which shapes economic behavior and resource allocation. This fundamental principle can sometimes overlook the needs of vulnerable populations.
The Three-Fifths Compromise: This clause allowed states to count three-fifths of their enslaved population for legislative representation, reflecting a compromise between slave-holding and non-slave-holding states. It highlights deep-rooted inequalities and illustrates how the founding documents often failed to recognize universal human rights.
Humanitarian Rights in the Constitution
The absence of explicit humanitarian rights—such as housing, healthcare, and social safety nets—has led to debates about the social contract in the U.S. While some elements in the Constitution outline some rights (like free speech and assembly), a comprehensive framework addressing basic human needs is lacking.
Evolving Rights: Over the years, various amendments and interpretations have aimed to expand civil rights, but these efforts often fall short of addressing systemic issues like homelessness.
Judicial Interpretations: Courts have sometimes recognized a right to shelter, but these rulings vary widely. The lack of a constitutional guarantee often leaves homeless individuals with limited legal recourse.
Historical Context of Capitalism
Capitalism as an economic system indeed became more defined around the late 18th century, particularly through works like Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" published in 1776. However, elements of capitalist thought date back to earlier economic theorists and practices.
Pre-Constitutional Capitalism: Concepts of trade, market economy, and property rights existed prior to the Constitution, reflecting the evolving nature of economic systems.
Conclusion
The connection between the Constitution, capitalism, and homelessness is multifaceted. While the Constitutional framework supports individual rights tied to capitalism, it often neglects the humanitarian rights essential for addressing systemic issues like homelessness. Understanding these historical and structural factors can provide insight into the ongoing challenges faced by vulnerable populations.
View 26 more replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@hippyjoe1955 never knew either dodgers or deserters. Yet I wasn't apart of the hippie movement either. Nor was my half brother who could have yet didn't.
hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M
@DeWayfarer I certainly wasn't a hippy. I only use the title because a friend of mine called me that when I started wearing an ear ring after I resigned my commission. Back in the day when everyone had a code name. His was Tubby. I met the American dodgers and deserters on various job sites. One became a school teacher another was a fantastic salesman. The others were good hard workers that the US lost because someone thought the Military Industrial Complex needed an excuse to exist.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@hippyjoe1955 Yeah I know all about the nicknames. Had one myself, as kid, yet it used apart of my first name, so I don't ever say it online.
I don't mind saying the one I got much later though, Awful Kanawful. Because of the motorcycle stunts I often pulled in the military.
I don't mind saying the one I got much later though, Awful Kanawful. Because of the motorcycle stunts I often pulled in the military.
Well the only signal it sends people is that you dont want help. If there is a will there is a way so anyone that is homeless by bad luck wont be homeless for long ge will keep trying and work at what is causeing him to have become homeless. If you have a kind individual many people would want to rent with him family would want to live with them and in general neibhors will want to lend a helping hand,I am not worried about becoming homeless.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
What's the signal, the message, that the homeless are sending?
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@Diotrephes that we live without your approval.
Like socialism, like Venezuela and Cuba - enemies.
Like socialism, like Venezuela and Cuba - enemies.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
Yes, cracking down is what Americans do about poverty! You're the most unequal so you're the most cruel.






