Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
JustJordan · 22-25, F
On that note I think that a lot of the smartest/most brilliant I ever met could explain a complex topic simply but we're also not afraid to admit when they were wrong or needed help
JustJordan · 22-25, F
@JonLosAngeles66 but sometimes being able to admit when you're wrong shows strong emotional intelligence even if not intellectual
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@JustJordan even better is knowing what they do after that changes because of the be knowledge!
JustJordan · 22-25, F
@samueltyler2 guess it's lucky then I can always rely on you for new knowledgeable/perspectives

People who can combine these qualities are few and far between.
bookerdana · M
the uni-bomber had an IQ of 167 and was a math proodigy
@bookerdana not much of a people person though
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@JonLosAngeles66 different situation actually.

No matter how some want to associate social etiquette as an intelligence factor it just simply isn't one.

They are totally different things. Actually social etiquette has a lot in common with how "vain" a person is and how well they can hide it.

Is it any wonder that "popular" politicians are also extremely good liars?

Yet IQ smart people are terrible liars. Also why Kaczynski (aka the Unabomber) lived far away from people. Most people are nosey and will find out the truth.
bookerdana · M
@JonLosAngeles66 My point was that like any random group,short people athletes,whatever there really are no more commonalities than you have with ,say your neighbor...the kindest people I met were "mentally challenged"

 
Post Comment