@EuphoricTurtle https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/08/the_fda_did_not_grant_full_approval_to_the_pfizer_shots.html Disagrees with you. This is an article that I just cam across a few minutes ago. It seems to echo what I read in another article a few days ago. Hmmm. I wonder what the truth is?
@EuphoricTurtle HJ doesn't follow links; he just disparages them. And he makes absurd claims he can't support. Here's a favorite, from earlier this morning:
@hippyjoe1955 I love how you commented something about the letters themselves and then realised it was too far fetched...EVEN FOR YOU...and deleted it😆
@EuphoricTurtle So you didn't read the letters yourself? I read the first one. It was an approval to license. It is not an approval for usage. The second letter doesn't show up when I try to find it so....
@hippyjoe1955 they didn't get a story wrong....they made up a story 😆
American Thinker editor and publisher Thomas Lifson posted an online statement saying that the website had received a “lengthy letter from Dominion's defamation lawyers explaining why they believe that their client has been the victim of defamatory statements.”
Lifson said that, “Having considered the full import of the letter,” he admitted that several pieces on the website “falsely accuse” Dominion “of conspiring to steal the November 2020 election from Donald Trump.”
Lifson added that the pieces “rely on discredited sources who have peddled debunked theories about Dominion’s supposed ties to Venezuela, fraud on Dominion’s machines that resulted in massive vote switching or weighted votes, and other claims falsely stating that there is credible evidence that Dominion acted fraudulently.”
The opinion website head confirmed, “These statements are completely false and have no basis in fact,” and that “Industry experts and public officials alike have confirmed that Dominion conducted itself appropriately and that there is simply no evidence to support these claims.”
“It was wrong for us to publish these false statements,” Lifson continued. “We apologize to Dominion for all of the harm this caused them and their employees,” the statement added, along with an apology to readers for what it called a “grave error.”
@EuphoricTurtle So you didn't read the letters yourself? I read the first one. It was an approval to license. It is not an approval for usage.
C'mon Joe...it's on the FIRST PAGE.😆
LICENSING We are issuing Department of Health and Human Services U.S. License No. 2229 to BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, Mainz, Germany, under the provisions of section 351(a) of the PHS Act controlling the manufacture and sale of biological products. The license authorizes you to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce, those products for which your company has demonstrated compliance with establishment and product standards.
Under this license, you are authorized to manufacture the product, COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA, which is indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older.
@hippyjoe1955 I tried to educate you about my religion. I guess I failed. This morning, my mission is to get you to provide substantiating evidence for the following three claims (I expect to fail in that too).
@EuphoricTurtle So you can't read English? That is the license to produce. The EUA is still in place which protects Pfizer from liability. Do you think Phizer is stupid enough to go for full approval? NOT A CHANCE!!!!!
let me make the quote smaller still since you are having problems following
The license authorizes you to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce, those products for which your company has demonstrated compliance with establishment and product standards.
Pfizer isn't a hospital or medical facility which USES vaccines, they merely manufacture them. And the BLA has always been a manufacturing licence.
The protection liability you are referring to is also awarded to other vaccines which are also.......c'mon buddy.....approved
@EuphoricTurtle All you show me is your inability to read English. Is it a second language for you? Your comprehension is severely lacking. Kind of a shame but Oh Well. Even ignorant people like you can offer their ill informed opinion on SW.
@EuphoricTurtle On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter
of authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses, and to authorize use of COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) under this EUA for certain uses that are not included in the approved BLA
