Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What if the problems we have in society (disparity, corruption, greed, short sightedness, etc) are intrinsic to human nature and can't be changed?

Maybe this is a hardware problem and not a software problem. Humans may just be built in such a way that we cannot help but to destroy ourselves when we get too numerous. I mean isn't that how it works for any other species?
Top | New | Old
SomeMichGuy · M Best Comment
For us, hardware & software are not separable. AND most people hold a constellation of opinions/views which are often wildly incompatible (like people who consider themselves to be profoundly religious Christians supporting a guy who in no way exhibits the character of the Person after whom that religion is named).

At root, I personally think that the fact that we sit in our own heads is what gets us; we come by selfishness quite naturally. Because of that fact, we can always be the heroes in our own views, the undeserving victims of others' injustices, the magnanimous going amongst the stingy, the smart/wise going amongst the stupid/foolish, the great going amidst the pedestrian.

Most importantly, it helps to make us NOT empathize with, sympathize with, understand others. Which is why we need to seek out those experiences.

RFK's visit to the South to actually see, in persom, for himself, truly abject poverty stands out as an amazing trip undertaken by a guy from one of the most privileged families in America. And by HIM doing that, a slew of reporters went along and showed a nation & the world the stark poverty which existed--and exists!--in this very rich nation.

It helped to wake up many people, I think. And seeing a rich, intelligent, cultivated white guy do this helped other rich, educated white guys (and gals) see this as real and a disturbing, heart-wrenching issue.

Education, travel, meeting people not like you--these can help chip away at the calcified selfishness which protects our hearts & heads from connecting with those whom we "other" or whom we have been raised/taught/socialized to "other".

In that light, interesting to look at the backgrounds of those who are most adamantly against science, other countries, even Americans "not like [them]".

It CAN be fixed, but, like doing what is necessary for controlling the virus, many do not want to.

plungesponge · 41-45, M
Coming to us soon: AI politicians, driven by open source code verified by blockchain
plungesponge · 41-45, M
@SW-User in time, we will likely merge with tech, or it replaces us. Really the only story is whether that switch is willingly or violently. Probably a bit of both
SW-User
@plungesponge if the AI will be as smart as people are afraid it will be, I'm sure it will come to the conclusion that the best way to destroy humans is to have them do it themselves.

All it would have to do is accept those who come willingly then quarantine the rest and leave them to their own devices.

They'd run themselves into the ground in a century tops.
plungesponge · 41-45, M
@SW-User you'd probably enjoy this [media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6bKp8NIUaI]
Why, thanks for the Best Comment!
SW-User
@SomeMichGuy anytime dude you're a thoughtful guy.
@SW-User I am humbled that you think so. Thank you for such an amazing compliment. I do try to give serious answers to serious questions.
Miram · 31-35, F
I believe both sides of the equation are intrinsic to nature.
Magenta · F
I don't believe there is an if. It is human nature.

 
Post Comment