This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
it is amazing how pathetic libs are. They know that Trump got 75-80 million actual votes that they had to cheat their asses off to overcome, and they know its coming again in 4 years. So this is them, trying to pull this BS stunt.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 But if he got more votes, including in the electoral college, wasn't it right to certify him the winner? That's how our democracy works.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@BohoBabe only if those votes were legal. But they were not. None of the fraud allegations - which were quite detailed - were taken seriously enough to be looked into. Had Trump won in a similar fashion, the same Democrats and corrupt Republicans would have raised the evidence, and the one-sided media would have sealed the investigation by hammering that evidence into us in a different light.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@Ambroseguy80 Yeah, keep believing that. In at most 12 days from now Trump will be history.
If you were right those lawsuits would've found out evidence, or at the very least they would've reasonably resorted on releasing such evidence publicly, and yet all I've seen are Trump followers postulating conspiracy theories around the fact that in-place ballots were red whereas mailed-in ones were blue, after one year in which many red voters shifted from hoarding toilet paper to not giving a damn altogether about the pandemic because their guru told them to.
If you were right those lawsuits would've found out evidence, or at the very least they would've reasonably resorted on releasing such evidence publicly, and yet all I've seen are Trump followers postulating conspiracy theories around the fact that in-place ballots were red whereas mailed-in ones were blue, after one year in which many red voters shifted from hoarding toilet paper to not giving a damn altogether about the pandemic because their guru told them to.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 That's because when Trump's lawyers were in court, they didn't present any evidence. They even admitted that these lawsuits weren't about voter fraud.
And the media is so not one-sided. Right-wing media defends Trump no matter what he does.
And the media is so not one-sided. Right-wing media defends Trump no matter what he does.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@BohoBabe they never even got to the evidence. They were dismissed on procedural grounds. Shows how much you know.
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 Only some of them, like that Texas lawsuit. But most of them were thrown out because the lawyers had no evidence of fraud, or even admitted that this wasn't about fraud.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@Ambroseguy80 Why not publish the evidence then? They claimed they had evidence about the Coronavirus being artificial as well, months ago, yet failed to produce anything (and stopped talking about that altogether when they realized their credibility dropped to zero). Where's the kraken?
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@BohoBabe I disagree.
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 It's not an opinion, it's a fact. You could not like it, but you can't really disagree with facts.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@BohoBabe it’s a fact because you say it is? Nahhhh
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 No, that's not how facts work. At least in the real world. I don't know about the alternate Trump world.
Ambroseguy80 · 56-60, M
@BohoBabe okay, Junior. Whatever you say
BohoBabe · M
@Ambroseguy80 Thank you, Daddy.
Elessar · 31-35, M
@Ambroseguy80 It's a fact because the accuser (of frauds) hasn't produced evidence. I suggest this reading:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/section-1/proof-burden-of-proof-and-presumptions
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-14/section-1/proof-burden-of-proof-and-presumptions