This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TiffAching · 31-35, F
If we’re talking Old Testament God, probably because He’s a petty little shit.
If we’re talking New Testament God, probably because He’s a petty little shit who’s disguising it as some kind of Hippie-Dippy self love crap.
If we’re talking Gnostic God, probably because the first thing that came into existence the Monad, which begat the dyad, which begat the numbers, which begat the point, begetting lines and shapes and other geometric forms, the full nature of which can only be properly defined through negative theology: “he” is immovable, invisible, intangible, ineffable; commonly, "he" is seen as being hermaphroditic, a potent symbol for being, as it were, "all-containing.” Or, TL;DR:
Ǫ̶̱͔͔̩̬̊r̶̝̈́͂̂͂̽́͠͝ ̵̜̪̟̖͉̦͆̃͗͠͠T̶͕̱̓͂̅͛̈́̊̀̚Ļ̶͍̻͛̒͒̈́;̸̛̺̌̓̈Ḏ̷̼̮͂̆R̷̟̪̳̯̣͉̯͆͋̓́͘̕:̶̺͓̜͓͛̔̏͘̚ ̸̢͍̱͇̣̠͙̿͠Z̷̨̼͊a̷̡̛̤̰͉͎͎̬̔͗͂͂̓͠ͅļ̵͈̳̦͎̦̻̬͆̿̀͋̚͝g̶̨̧̢͎̖̤̎o̴̢̢̹̝̼͉̤̬͝
And if we’re talking Deistic God: Because He don’t give a fuck.
If we’re talking New Testament God, probably because He’s a petty little shit who’s disguising it as some kind of Hippie-Dippy self love crap.
If we’re talking Gnostic God, probably because the first thing that came into existence the Monad, which begat the dyad, which begat the numbers, which begat the point, begetting lines and shapes and other geometric forms, the full nature of which can only be properly defined through negative theology: “he” is immovable, invisible, intangible, ineffable; commonly, "he" is seen as being hermaphroditic, a potent symbol for being, as it were, "all-containing.” Or, TL;DR:
Ǫ̶̱͔͔̩̬̊r̶̝̈́͂̂͂̽́͠͝ ̵̜̪̟̖͉̦͆̃͗͠͠T̶͕̱̓͂̅͛̈́̊̀̚Ļ̶͍̻͛̒͒̈́;̸̛̺̌̓̈Ḏ̷̼̮͂̆R̷̟̪̳̯̣͉̯͆͋̓́͘̕:̶̺͓̜͓͛̔̏͘̚ ̸̢͍̱͇̣̠͙̿͠Z̷̨̼͊a̷̡̛̤̰͉͎͎̬̔͗͂͂̓͠ͅļ̵͈̳̦͎̦̻̬͆̿̀͋̚͝g̶̨̧̢͎̖̤̎o̴̢̢̹̝̼͉̤̬͝
And if we’re talking Deistic God: Because He don’t give a fuck.