Liberals call drug dealers "non-violent offenders, " but the reality is it's not a non-violent act.

@MorbidCynic Okay so what happens when someone sells crack to your sister or your daughter? Or maybe even you?

And what about the government funds that go into drug prevention, shelters, rehabilitation and billions of dollars that go into helping these people? If I subscribe to what you say then I would say that it's not the taxpayers burden to provide any funding to fight drug abuse or rehabilitation.

You have to think about the bigger picture here, which is what kind of society would be created if we legalized these drugs? We'd be living in chaos 😂

That’s not my point. It’s irrelevant in the concept of freedom.

I already think it’s not the taxpayers burden to help them.

No we wouldn’t. Most people already don’t want to do hard drugs. People who do, are already do them. This way we are taking power away from violent cartels that do a lot more harm. You’re not looking at the bigger picture. Prohibition stops no one from using, and only makes cartels rich.


@SW-User

@MorbidCynic I'm trying to understand your proposal. Are you saying we allow drug dealers to sell drugs like crystal meth and Flakka and not arrest them?

Not cartels. 🤦‍♀️@SW-User

@MorbidCynic I agree with part of what you're saying. It may work there but it won't work here. We have this country called Mexico and we can't even stop people from coming across the border.

Borders should be open to all people anyway. @SW-User