Liberalism is a mental disorder.

They claim trump is worse than Mao, Stalin and Hitler and dangerous for the country and the world- yet they still want to confiscate guns, which is the real reason we have the second amendment.

They demand that everyone accept the science behind man made global warming, yet they now refuse to accept human biology and the scientific fact that there are only 2 genders.

To each there own, believe what you want... I just dont get it.

Because people dont believe it happened and I dont have to keep wandering questions.. here are 2 examples.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/duke-university-shrink-trump-may-be-worse-than-hitler-stalin-and-mao/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles-hitler/

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Piper · 61-69, F

Many liberal leaning people do think Trump is dangerous, with his cavalier attitude towards most all things concerning environmental issues, and the non-human animals we share this earth with. That, and his expressing the desire to suppress those who express views not positive enough towards him to his liking.

Many liberal leaning people have indeed noticed, that the current president has expressed an odd admiration for certain brutal dictators. To "compare" him to those you mentioned though, is just not a reasonable thing for [i]anyone [/i]to do..at this point.

Carla · 61-69, F

Yeah.... this 👆

krf336 · M

@Piper I dont recall him ever trying to suppress, or expressing interest in suppressing any opinions. He does stand up for himself and call them out when they say stupid shit, like comparing him to mass murdering dictators.

But I respect that you see things differently.

Piper · 61-69, F

@krf336 I'm not sure why you haven't heard him speaking about wishing to suppress certain individuals who don't speak favorably of him in certain venues. Perhaps I listen to him speak more than you, but I'm not assuming that to be the case.

krf336 · M

@Piper changing the arguement because you cant provide a counter point is not helping your case.
But I'll play along.

If that is the case then show your work and provide links for his suppressive speech. If that's true then there should be plenty of examples.

Piper · 61-69, F

@krf336 I'm not sure you mean by "changing the argument". I do know that I've heard Trump speak of wishing to suppress the speech of media outlets and individuals who write or speak in a way not favorable enough for him.

Providing[i] my work[/i] to find those quotes tonight, is not something I can do, so it's okay if you doubt what I know I've heard. I probably would, if I had any inclination to defend the man.

krf336 · M

@Piper That's what I thought. That you think defending himself against against the media.
First of all, he has made no attempts to silence anyone in the media, except that self absorbed Jim Acosta, who is rude and obnoxious to the president and other reporters, but kicking him out of the White House is hardly silencing him. The guy refused to follow and kind of decorum.

And if the media was calling me an agent of russia and co.paring me to hitler and stalin and mao and constantly publishing slanderous and untrue reports you can be damn sure I would want to shut them up too.

But again, wanting to and doing it are not the same thing. And do you think there are not millions of americans that want the president to shut up and stay off Twitter?

That's the same thing.

Here are 2 examples of idiots that shouldn't be allowed on the news anymore.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/duke-university-shrink-trump-may-be-worse-than-hitler-stalin-and-mao/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/09/13/dont-compare-donald-trump-to-adolf-hitler-it-belittles-hitler/