Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Not at all.
Keepitsimple 路 51-55, F
Not at all. What is said in PM means a lot more.
Zonuss 路 41-45, M
@Keepitsimple Oh you are bad. 馃き
Keepitsimple 路 51-55, F
Why? A person could put single but live with a person for 20 years. @Zonuss
MLGecko 路 46-50, M
Absolutely. If I see single then I just assume they are happy and content.
Keepitsimple 路 51-55, F
馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃ぃ馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃槀馃憤@MLGecko
If I start messaging with someone and the conversation gets more personal, I'll address one another's marital status to see if that has any bearing. If it's just my usual quippy reply to posts, I don't distinguish.
RubySoo 路 56-60, F
No....coz im not here for any romancin'.
So married...not married nakes no odds.
So married...not married nakes no odds.
SW-User
No their personality towards me does.
Nope
Zonuss 路 41-45, M
@Zonuss I rarely look at profiles...but when I do it鈥檚 not the first thing I look for. Some sw members don鈥檛 even fill that part in....
Yes. But I also take into consideration what they share in the "About Me" section.
View 3 more replies 禄
@FigNewton I really don't have many views compared to others (I just looked). But I also don't get many private messages either. I would like to attribute that to my "About Me"
Zonuss 路 41-45, M
@Pinkstarburst Dont forget some are just flat out liars and cheaters too ! 馃槅
LilPuckBunny 路 F
No as I'm happily married myself so it makes no difference.
SW-User
i don't interact with married bums
JohnOinger 路 41-45, M
@SW-User you don't talk to married chicks on here
SW-User
I dont look at profiles :/
SW-User
[c=#BF0000]Yeah I tend to distance myself[/c]
DragunFruit 路 26-30, F
Yes
Zonuss 路 41-45, M
@DragunFruit 馃
QuixoticSoul 路 41-45, M
I鈥檓 offended 馃槀