This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
bijouxbroussard · F
To hazard a guess, I’d think those who’d already indicated that they were a danger to themselves or others.
Unfortunately, some of our shooters did not previously indicate that they were dangerous. It’s moot, of course; many states already have laws restricting gun ownership of (and including the ability to remove guns from) those classified as “dangerously mentally ill”. Texas was not one of those states. Nevada, and Florida are, but rarely enforce it.
Unfortunately, some of our shooters did not previously indicate that they were dangerous. It’s moot, of course; many states already have laws restricting gun ownership of (and including the ability to remove guns from) those classified as “dangerously mentally ill”. Texas was not one of those states. Nevada, and Florida are, but rarely enforce it.