This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I think it works like this. Suppose there were a ledger with transactions. First, you start by giving everybody a copy. So everybody knows who owns what, and the history. Then people start buying and selling things.
When somebody makes a transaction, first they record it to their ledger. That is, they add a new "block" to their "chain" of transactions. Then, they share their ledger and the other ledgers will start to add the new block to to their own ledger. So the change proliferates to all the other ledgers. Eventually everybody has the same information. So there is no fraud. Now, somebody can and will try to fake things by falsifying their ledger. So we have a situation where everybody has the same ledger, then it splits. Most of the people will have the true fraud-free chain, and only a few will have the fraudulent split.
As the blocks proliferate in the network, naturally conflicts will arise. That is, when a new block is added to a good chain, it will then need to be added to the bad chain, and this causes a conflict because the bad chain has a different history from the good chain (blockchain histories cannot be altered, only new blocks added, the histories are protected via cryptographic methods). Similarly, when the bad blockchain ads a new block, and asks other blockchains to add it, too, there is a conflict.
So these conflicts get recorded as separate branches of the blockchain. Because a majority of the blocks are good, they tend to proliferate more and grow faster than the ones that are bad. So to find the true blockchain, one searches the network for the longest chain, and as this is adopted it gets even more dominant and longer and the bad chain gets left behind.
At least I think it is how it works, or something like that.
If a bad actor somehow manages to gain control over a majority of the ledgers, though, this can be a problem. But it is difficult.
When somebody makes a transaction, first they record it to their ledger. That is, they add a new "block" to their "chain" of transactions. Then, they share their ledger and the other ledgers will start to add the new block to to their own ledger. So the change proliferates to all the other ledgers. Eventually everybody has the same information. So there is no fraud. Now, somebody can and will try to fake things by falsifying their ledger. So we have a situation where everybody has the same ledger, then it splits. Most of the people will have the true fraud-free chain, and only a few will have the fraudulent split.
As the blocks proliferate in the network, naturally conflicts will arise. That is, when a new block is added to a good chain, it will then need to be added to the bad chain, and this causes a conflict because the bad chain has a different history from the good chain (blockchain histories cannot be altered, only new blocks added, the histories are protected via cryptographic methods). Similarly, when the bad blockchain ads a new block, and asks other blockchains to add it, too, there is a conflict.
So these conflicts get recorded as separate branches of the blockchain. Because a majority of the blocks are good, they tend to proliferate more and grow faster than the ones that are bad. So to find the true blockchain, one searches the network for the longest chain, and as this is adopted it gets even more dominant and longer and the bad chain gets left behind.
At least I think it is how it works, or something like that.
If a bad actor somehow manages to gain control over a majority of the ledgers, though, this can be a problem. But it is difficult.
JoyfulSilence · 46-50, M
@Poppies I may have not got it all right. Honestly, I am still confused.
This helps a bit:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
I may have been wrong about all these blocks spreading and not necessarily matching. It seems there is an attempt to verify things before adding a new block.
This helps a bit:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
I may have been wrong about all these blocks spreading and not necessarily matching. It seems there is an attempt to verify things before adding a new block.
Poppies · 61-69, F
@JoyfulSilence I am not sure your answer is better than any of these others, but you get a BA for effort! I still don't really know what this is all about, but I haven't followed your links yet, either. Thank you.