Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would you go and live on Mars?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
No way. It’s a desert of rust
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga That would be all the artifacts from the previous occupiers...laying there,rusting...not far from the face on Mars,and the pyramids.
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow it’s red because it’s covered by iron oxide (rust). I don’t believe there are any structures on mars . The face is only an optical illusion on the photograph
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga Untrue.The face was proved to be genuine through the efforts of two reporters who took the time and trouble to syphon through NASAs pics until they found another pic,taken from a different angle,which proven the details were genuine,not shadow.
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow and yet it’s not on any mainstream media? I mean this would be a discovery of great significance I assume. If the media would cover the topic up,what would be a reason for it?
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
Indeed.What reason could mainstream media possibly have for not reporting an issue of huge import?Ok,so the mainstream media is owned by those who run this world,but even so,why would they wish to keep us in ignorance? 🤔
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow if they wish to keep us in ignorance,why would they show the picture in the first place? Why is the mars program not classified?
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga NASA,far from the popular belief of being a civilian based organisation,is a military organisation.Would you seriously contemplate it being anything else when such a huge sum is spent on space exploration?The Mars program IS classified,but there remains a need to show joe public what he is (not) getting for his tax dollars.
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow nasa was shut down because of lack of funds not long ago. They are reliant on government funding,they also operate on a very tight budget compared to the army. They could still be talking about moon exploration if they wanted to. Joe public doesn’t need to know about mars,the rovers,deep space exploration etc. They don’t accidentally leak pictures. They are the ones putting it on their website for everyone to see. I don’t think anyone thinks that nasa is a private company
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga NASA is NOT a private company,it is a part of the state.NASA also claimed recently that they could not return to the moon,because they had "lost" the technology.Do you find that credible as well?
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow nasa returned to the moon what seven times? By losing the technology I assume they meant the last shuttle,which was retired and being displayed in a museum as we speak. The new shuttle is being built for the mars mission. They don’t have a plane. Simple as that. I never said it was a private company. They are not military either. Sure,they probably have military contracts but it’s a completely separate organization
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga No,NASA claims to have lost the tech,full stop.Ridiculous.NASA is indeed a military organisation,but does not advertise it self as such for media reasons and the Qs which would be asked.And back to the face,it was proved to be genuine,not an illusion.Always,always back to that little fact...
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow i just looked it up,it is indeed the shuttle they were talking about. They use the spaceX dragon to travel to the ISS and building the orion for further journeys. They don’t have a vehicle that could take them as far as the moon atm. The face was never proven and remember that it’s only available to the public because nasa allowed the image to circulate. Nasa is not the only space agency on the planet,it has competitors. It’s not called the space race by accident. Why would they advertise themselves as a military organization? You said the same people run the media,run the world. So following your logic,those people are hiding secret facts from themselves?
pedrohedgerow · 61-69, M
@Bagalamaga Source?Where did you go for your info?Did you trouble to look anywhere other than NASA itself?I suggest you become familiar with Richard Hoaglands work on Cydonia,which proves beyond any shadow of doubt that Mars is far more than NASA have,or will,inform the public of.Hoagland was employed by NASA and is a recognised authority on the subject.Further,how does those owning the media passing false info through the media they own implicate that they are fooling themselves rather than using their media to fool others?
Bagalamaga · 56-60, M
@pedrohedgerow did you notice that every time there’s a conspiracy about something it’s always linked to someone who was the roommate of someone who used to be a janitor at the organization? Same with the moon landings,the ISS is a hoax etc. Imagine how sick and tired astronomers,nasa scientists,engineers and astronauts must be because of this constant distrust. They spent their entire life being a part of something they believe would move the human race forward while someone talking trash on spacenerds.com..they don’t need to fool the public about anything other than weaponry. What if they say that yes,there are artifacts on mars,green aliens dancing around blue campfires? As an average person,what are you going to do about it? Gun down your neighbors? No. Life goes on