Top | Newest First | Oldest First
cultofaction · 26-30, M
SW-User
@cultofaction Yeah you can be rational and still act recklessly with intent.
cultofaction · 26-30, M
@SW-User Are you sure?
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
It gets you a police state in the end, a leftist controlled technocracy. Sixty years of cow-towing to leftist extremism has created the most expansive and extensive police state in human history.
The left has managed to move the goal posts little by little. The irrationality of their ways is fully out in the open now. We all sat back and let it happen.
Rational law abiding citizens are under attack. We now have a government who can come lock you up by literally creating a crime out of thin air, and then look for or fabricate the "evidence" after you have been incarcerated. It's sick and getting sicker out there.
The left has managed to move the goal posts little by little. The irrationality of their ways is fully out in the open now. We all sat back and let it happen.
Rational law abiding citizens are under attack. We now have a government who can come lock you up by literally creating a crime out of thin air, and then look for or fabricate the "evidence" after you have been incarcerated. It's sick and getting sicker out there.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
cultofaction · 26-30, M
@Sepia It's my opinion that a number of rational people have ended up in plenty of trouble.
Sepia · 36-40, F
@cultofaction ok..but their rational act saves them
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
cultofaction · 26-30, M
@Picklebobble2 One could argue that in incomplete-information games that the optimal strategy is often *not* to behave entirely rationally. It would seem that in a lot of ways humans are tuned to the incomplete-information game called life -- we don't always act rationally. Why are we attracted to the people we are? Why are we interested in the goals we choose? It's not entirely clear, as a purely rational being would make vastly different decisions. Yet somehow, we exist.
