My apologetics' stance on homosexuality
If my position on homosexuality qualifies me to be a homophobe, I will accept that title. Despite the fact that I know and you know that the term is a misnomer since the word "phobia" implies an irrational fear of something, nevertheless, rather than engage in an inutile debate over the etymology of the word, I will simply accept the title.
However, I will reject the notion that not approving of the LBGT lifestyle qualifies me as a bigot or means that I hate homosexuals. I do not hate homosexuals no more than I hate cigarette smokers, or potheads, however, I do believe the lifestyle is unhealthy and immoral.
Why should I concern myself with what homosexuals do, you ask? Simple, 1) because they do it in public and these days, they are trying to force a false doctrine on Americans which says that people are born gay, which isn't true. 2) because I think it should be a crime for a mother or father to confuse a little boy by raising him up to believe be is a girl... by encouraging a little boy who is confused, to act like a girl. This is very sick behavior on the parents part.
However, I will reject the notion that not approving of the LBGT lifestyle qualifies me as a bigot or means that I hate homosexuals. I do not hate homosexuals no more than I hate cigarette smokers, or potheads, however, I do believe the lifestyle is unhealthy and immoral.
Why should I concern myself with what homosexuals do, you ask? Simple, 1) because they do it in public and these days, they are trying to force a false doctrine on Americans which says that people are born gay, which isn't true. 2) because I think it should be a crime for a mother or father to confuse a little boy by raising him up to believe be is a girl... by encouraging a little boy who is confused, to act like a girl. This is very sick behavior on the parents part.
31-35, M
