This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GwydionFrost · 56-60, M
Actually, in this case, I think it has less to do with a presumption that the Almighty cannot defend himself, and more with the Church of England (meaning-- state endorsed religion).
Because, you see, like obscenity, one requires a clear definition of what "blasphemous" is (and that requires ONE doctrine of beliefs), since it varies from person to person.
Because, you see, like obscenity, one requires a clear definition of what "blasphemous" is (and that requires ONE doctrine of beliefs), since it varies from person to person.
suzie1960 · 61-69, F
@GwydionFrost Shouldn't the almighty be allowed to decide for itself what it considers and take its own action?
GwydionFrost · 56-60, M
@suzie1960 Ah, there is the rub. Man making decisions not meant for man to make.