Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Intel Signs $30 Billion Funding Partnership With Brookfield to Finance Chip-Factory Expansion

Brookfield is a publicly traded Canadian asset-management company. Intel is likely to announce additional deals, to bankroll its push to bring back production level chip production to the US, and push beyond what the Taiwanese and South Korean fabs are capable of doing.

Under the deal, a first of its kind for the industry, Intel would fund 51% of the cost of building new chip-making facilities in Chandler, Ariz., and will have a controlling stake in the financing vehicle that would own the new factories. Brookfield will own the remainder of the equity and the companies will split the revenue that comes out of the factories, he added.

Such deals are common in the energy and telecommunications and are now trickling into the chip business because of its massive capital investment requirements. Not to mention the new US spending bill, dedicating $Bs to bering mass production back to the US.

Intel is building 2 new factories in Arizona, and expects to be spending $100B on new plant complexes in Ohio and Germany, to regain dominance in the European market.

TSMC announced it's spending $100B over the next 3 years to boost output, and Samsung said it will spend $205 B doing the same, over the next 3 years.
Carla · 61-69, F
Well...it looks as though we may be needing to process more people through immigration. Unless of course, these plants are mostly automated.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Carla They are. The mass human element comes in at the mobile phone assembly end not the chip fab end. When you sell upwards of 50 million phones per quarter you need a lot of phone assemblers.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Good luck with that. TSMC are light years ahead.
Northwest · M
@justanothername Both TSMC and Samsung get the bleeding edge know how from the US and the Dutch. Intel made a decision decades ago, to go fabless, as this was the trend at the time: put your resources into design, and farm out the "mundane" stuff. I think Intel is capable of doing it. Pat Gelsinger is the right guy to do it.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@Northwest TSMC is well ahead of Samsung.
Northwest · M
@justanothername Apples and Oranges. For the bleeding edge stuff, they are in two different markets. TSMC's focus in on CPUs and Samsung is on memory, making them both top in their separate categories.

The guy behind their initial success (jumped from TSMC to Samsung), is now working for SMIC (China), and seems to have won an internal battle for the top architecture spot. He's Taiwanese. He's trying to use his former connections to import US and Dutch technology, but his efforts are frustrated by US/European technology export bans, and the Chinese' own inability to match what the West has in infrastructure technology.

 
Post Comment