This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GkB01 · 51-55, M
So obviously bare feet. Why take one pair of shoes of just to put another on?
1-25 of 28
GkB01 · 51-55, M
@Adec757 It's just what I think, I suppose. For me as I've often thought, once I discovered PE in bare feet, if my body was getting exercise, why shouldn't my feet and toes as well!! I only just spotted your poll. For me the 30% not in favour of bare feet, don't know what they're missing.
GkB01 · 51-55, M
@Adec757 Yes, some have said that on here that in the UK barefoot PE is very popular and encouraged. That was certainly my experience doing PE in the 1970's and 1980's. I've heard that some teachers teach in bare feet too (the ultimate encouragement) though mine didn't. I would like to think it's always been popular, though I suppose this may have waned at times.
mazza62 · 61-69, M
barefoot
mazza62 · 61-69, M
all the way through school
mazza62 · 61-69, M
yes i remember those. We werent allowed to wear outdoors shoes in primary and middle school. We had to change into plimsolls in the cloakroom
mazza62 · 61-69, M
good question. we rarely did pe outdoors if at all. i cant really remember
mazza62 · 61-69, M
right. no we never had a choice
GkB01 · 51-55, M
@Adec757 I'm guessing that what you're describing you wore was what I'd have called pumps. I must admit I didn't have the 'pleasure', lace up white plimsoles and socks being our schools preference at least. I think lace ups were possibly more airy. I can only imagine how restrictive and uncomfortable those black pumps would have been. Much better and more pleasant to just do without them altogether!
1-25 of 28