Theory of God

After 100 years from now,
I believe we would be creating GTA character having his own Will.
i.e the character would feel he is real and his world is real. Because in his frame he perceive his world as real.

The GTA world exist because we are observing/measuring their world.

This is explained in the Schrodinger cat exp.
The cat is nor dead nor alive until some one Observes/measures it.

i.e Our world too exist because there is an universal Observer/God.

So, the flow of current from our dimension is used as our extended consciousness to help us observe/measure the whole GTA world.
i.e GTA world exists because we Observe their world.

Now,
Can we conscious observer of the GTA world physically enter inside their world?
i.e Can you and I physically enter inside computer world?

No, Never !

Similarly, The God of the whole Universe with all that infinite energy, if God decides to physically appear inside finite Earth
Can our Earth hold all that infinite energy of the God?
No, the system itself will break !
Earth and our Universe will Collapse if God enter physically inside Earth!

Hence according to my personal opinion,
100% GOD used an interaction body to interact physically with Earth !

All this is just inside my head guys
Please don't spread hate, I just wanted to share my thoughts with someone. So yeah, What do you folks thinks about this?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ABCDEF7 · M

"Brahma satyam jagat-mithya jivo brahmaiva naparah"-- Jagad guru Adi Shankarachaya

Early in the 1920's against the backdrop of the emerging quantum theories , an idea was promulgated predominantly in the scientific communities , that a quantum particle doesn't exist in one state or another, but lies in a superposition of states until a collapse of a wave function

In quantum mechanics, wave function collapse occurs when a wave function— a superposition of several eigenstates—reduces to a single eigenstate -- owing to interaction with the Observer . This interaction is "observation".

Henceforth an ineluctable inference was drawn that the world makes sense only when there is a Observer.

Adhi Shankaracharya has elaborated on three kinds of reality

1) Päramärthika . Absolute reality -- the Brahman

2) Vyävahärika -- The empirical world -- The domain that our current modern science is mostly dealing with. Also curiously termed as "objective reality", (if ever truly objective reality was possible)

3)Prätibhäshika -- The illusionary world of appearances - the dream state -- the illusionary imaginary world.

Both time and space are proven empirical -- Time itself being relative and Einstein adhering to lorentz transformations as a crux for special relativity.

Ancient Indian texts have it that the world is Sat-Asat Vilakshana Anirvachaniya

Source: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/brahma-satyam-jagan-mithya-jivo-brahmaiva-naparah-subramaniam-pmp

vipul · 31-35, M

@ABCDEF7
Good post !
Give me some time to understand your opinion.

vipul · 31-35, M

@ABCDEF7
Understood !

Yes, if we not take hinduism as a religion, there is surely great ancient philosophy and psychology attached.

They surely had deep understanding of the cosmos and life itself.

So, surely there are many wise things to learn from ancient Indian teachings !

ElwoodBlues · M

@ABCDEF7

owing to interaction with the Observer . This interaction is "observation".

I think that any interaction that collapses the eigenstates involves some form of measurement involving exchange of energy. I think "observation" in the quantum sense always involves some exchange of energy.

vipul · 31-35, M

@ElwoodBlues
Yes, correctly said !

Now if Energy can neither be created nor destroyed and if God cannot be created and nor destroyed then

God is the Source of energy on which this whole universe is based.

Hence I said, God cannot come on earth at a finite place because Earth cannot hold God(Energy).

ElwoodBlues · M

@vipul I'm sticking to the measurable and observable predictions of quantum mechanics, relativity, and the rest of physics.

vipul · 31-35, M

@ElwoodBlues
So you think there is an universal observer, like I do ?

I am sorry I didn't get you !
I am using science to explain God by the way.

ElwoodBlues · M

@vipul I don't really think that, no. In my sense of the word, "observing" involves an exchange of energy and a collapse of wave functions. For quantum objects to do the weird things they do, they need to spend some time "unobserved" while wave functions propagate. I think a universal observer would mess that up. Also, since "observing" involves an exchange of energy, that would have a measurable influence even at the micro level, and I don't think we measure that.

vipul · 31-35, M

@ElwoodBlues
Okay ElwoodBlues.

But have you thought this way ?
Like I said,
The GTA world exist because of the flow of current from our dimension.

i.e if I stop flow of current, their whole world stop existing RIGHT ?

Look,
The GTA character with a FREE WILL thinks his world is real and are the co-creator of GTA world like
i.e Their own observation are modifying their world.
Eg: 'A' character observing a cat dying or a tree to fall or any other incident..

I am simply saying, they are co-creators of the GTA world but
Their whole world is existing because we are observing/measuring them with the help of 'Current Flow'
If we stop the Current flow, their world stop existing.

SO, I am saying,
We are conscious co-creators of our world but the energy which has no origin and no end, which can neither be created nor be destroyed,
If this energy is stopped, our whole world will stop existing.

And God is Energy !

Have a though in this way !
And yeah please free to reply, we are always learning from each other.

vipul · 31-35, M

@ElwoodBlues
You haven't replied yet !
Just asking btw.

ElwoodBlues · M

@vipul I have nothing to add. I'm sticking to the measurable and observable predictions of quantum mechanics, relativity, and the rest of physics.