Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The death of truth?

In Joseph Ratzinger's book Salt of the Earth (Ignatius Press, 1997), the author confronts the most unsettling question for this time: Is it arrogant for us to claim knowledge of truth, given our limitations? There's often a certain intellectual humility that makes us hesitate to claim we can know it all.

Ratzinger's own answer —drawn from experience, reason, and revelation— was that truth must not only be preserved but demanded, even at the cost of comfort or popularity. Our contemporary culture is saturated with relativism. Truth has become "your truth" or "my truth," rather than the truth.

The warning goes that once truth is no longer the compass, society devolves into chaos, governed not by justice but by the arbitrary will of individuals or powerful collectives. Without truth, there is no objective standard. Right and wrong become products of culture, majority rule, or emotional persuasion.

On the ground there's the beginning of moral disintegration because morality becomes a game of opinions without truth. If there's no objective moral law, anything becomes permissible with the right justification or social pressure. Ratzinger claims that without truth soon there emerges immorality under the guise of compassion or freedom.

Once truth becomes subjective, governance devolves into manipulation. Those in power create realities —shifting definitions of rights, life, justice, even gender, so wrote Ratzinger before the start of the Millenium. Moreover, something like Relativism isn't neutral because it's ultimatelty also toxic to the well-being of a person.

Without truth, even something like spirituality, let alone religion becomes a lifestyle accessory, and faith in anything or anyone becomes emotion-based, not revelation-rooted. Truly many spiritual seekers today float between systems, choosing what “feels good,” rather than what is revealed to them.

Are you troubled about the lies all about, then start by confronting lies within oneself. Speak the truth in your family, workplace, and online. Ratzinger's end conclusion is that we all should hold fast to the truth with courage and humility for we aren't just bearers of light, but also protectors of the soul of civilization.
Top | New | Old
This couldn't be more apt in todays world.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@jshm2 Thank you for your own analysis. No, not everyone can be a Christian.
bookerdana · M
I' a Father Brown Fan,but,When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.🤔
bookerdana · M
@GeretJan Wait...who told you of my chessic tendencies🤔


sigh😓 wayy beyond my coffee level RN...ever see John Lennox..the author and online debtor knew Lewis,as a teacher
@bookerdana Oh yes, Sam, I know of you. Have a big file laying on my desk. Yes, I know of John Lennox too. Admirable thinker. Defended truth in Oxford. I like his debate with Richard Dawkins but I find that Rowan Williams got Dawkins drilling even deeper for oil.
bookerdana · M
@GeretJan Lennox loosened the jar😄
If you want truth, test. Truth demands testing.
@BlueSkyKing If you think so. Not everyone has the same opinion.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
What about the truth that Ratzinger protected child rapists?
@Fukfacewillie Thank you for your contribution.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@GeretJan I wasn’t being rhetorical, though. Your source accepts child rape.
@Fukfacewillie Look, I quite the Roman Catholic Church because of it. But I'm not going to throw away the baby with the bathwater either. In essence, the idea was to talk about theology. You know that his brother actually was at the head of a famous choir in Germany that had schools where abuse was happening? The Church as an institution did do wrong.
Creaky · 51-55, M
I prefer to go with what can be demonstrated empirically.
@Creaky That's your truth then. Not my idea because it doesn't my experiences nor revelation.
Creaky · 51-55, M
@GeretJan 😄
But whose truths? My truths are undoubtedly different from Ratzinger's. Whose prevails, mine or his?
@LeopoldBloom What tells your own revelation about that then?
hunkalove · 70-79, M
No such thing as truth. Never has been. Your truth isn't anyone else's.
@Richard65 Of course, the violence nor any conversion matters. It's the relevation that counts.
Richard65 · M
@GeretJan there is no truth in revelation. There's only faith, it's the bedrock of all Abrahamic religions and faith is defined as belief without evidence. If you know it to be true then you have no need of faith (faith only exists in the presence of doubt as it counteracts doubt) and your theological house of cards comes crashing down.
@Richard65 There is truth in revelation when comes to it without the knowledge.

 
Post Comment