Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Are Secular History Text Books Trustworthy?

How Secular History Textbooks Corrupt Our Children’s Minds and Faith

In today’s fast-paced, rapid-fire political and social environment, we often find ourselves either focused on what is happening right now or looking to the future. After all, with so many breaking news headlines and current trends constantly blasting us in the face, who has time to think about last week, let alone what happened years or centuries ago? Still, understanding the past is crucial to making sense of our world today.

For instance, as we face uncertainties in our economy and society, it would be good to know what economic and moral choices worked in the past and which didn’t. But before you crack open your old history textbook or start searching Wikipedia, it is critical to think about who wrote the book or article you’re about to learn from. Think about it—we probably all took some sort of history class in high school or college, but did you ever think about whose version of history you were being told? What were the professor’s philosophic leanings, and what were the biases of the author?

Today, the world is full of distrust. News agencies, AI, government officials, social media influencers—we could all list dozens of people and entities that we don’t trust. But what about in the classroom? What lessons from the past are our children being taught? After all, some of the same worldviews and agendas that shape the actions of pastors, politicians, and influencers also can be found entrenched in the history that our children read. And while a history textbook is an essential part of any history class, we rarely consider if the “facts” in that textbook are accurate.

Where did this information come from? Who chose to include these specific details? Would we agree that these “facts” are being presented accurately?

We cannot necessarily trust a textbook unless we can also trust the authors. And when godless writers are at the helm, philosophies like Marxism, the LGBTQ+ agenda, and evolution can be found scattered throughout history coursework, warping traditional accounts of history and shaping how our children perceive the past. To better illustrate this, let’s take a look at some of the topics presented in

Part 1—The Opening Chapters: The Prehistory of Man and Civilization

As would be expected in most public school curricula, secular history textbooks ignore how God created man as a unique being. From the beginning of Genesis, we see that man is the crowning achievement of God’s creation. In those first two chapters, God creates man in his likeness (1:27), designs a special place for him (2:8), and gives him both responsibility (2:15) and purpose (1:28). In contrast, it is no surprise that most secular history textbooks, influenced by Darwinian evolution, present a lesser view of man. Rather than highlighting the uniqueness of man or his God-given purpose, secular textbooks suggest that both man and civilizations are simply the result of evolutionary pressures, with no credit given to God. Though God bestowed man with many blessings, including dexterity and intelligence, secular textbooks instead credit these abilities to evolutionary chance.

As one history textbook, World History: Patterns of Interaction, explains, “Early hominids had already developed the opposable thumb,” which “was crucial for tasks such as picking up small objects and making tools.”1 The book further emphasizes that “the invention of tools, mastery over fire, and the development of language are some of the most impressive achievements in human history.”2 This clearly contradicts the Bible, for not only was Adam able to speak immediately after being created, but he was intelligent (Genesis 2:19–20), and his descendants were rapidly building cities, practicing husbandry, creating musical instruments, and working with metal (Genesis 4:17, 20–22).

Secular history textbooks not only ignore man’s uniqueness, but they also fail to acknowledge God’s guiding hand on history, instead insisting that civilization came about haphazardly. Patterns of Interaction, after detailing how humans evolved from early hominids in Africa, explains that as mankind’s agricultural prowess gradually became more advanced, man “began dwelling in larger, more organized communities, such as farming villages and towns. From some of these settlements, cities gradually emerged, forming the backdrop of a more complex way of life—civilization.”3 While some of this explanation accurately describes how a society grows, it ignores how God formed and shaped the nations of the world. After resetting civilization with the flood (Genesis 6–8), God provided the groundwork for government (Genesis 9:5) and intervened in the building of the tower of Babel (Genesis 11). These are a few early examples of how God guided civilization. In contrast, rather than acknowledging the power of God to work in the lives of men, secular textbooks emphasize that man alone slowly built civilization over time.

Without the solid foundation of the Bible, there is no governing plan for the world, and the rise and fall of nations and empires is not the work of providence but instead the mere happenstance of history. This stands in sharp contrast to a Christian worldview, which emphasizes that God has moved mightily throughout history. There is a purposeful direction in which all of world history has been guided, and it helps us make sense of the world around us. When we see how God shaped the world when looking at history from a Christian perspective, we can see so many miraculous and wondrous things. Joseph was providentially sold into slavery to save his family from famine. Moses was providentially saved from a premature death to lead the Israelites out of Egypt. Christ providentially died on the cross to save the world from damnation. And the fires of persecution providentially spread Christianity throughout the world.4 God clearly had a guiding hand on history, and when we look to the past, we can see the endless miracles that he instituted to further his kingdom. That’s something you won’t find in a secular history textbook, which demonstrates why the underlying philosophies found in history textbooks matter.

by Cory Von Eiff on January 28, 2026
Featured in Answers in Depth

Part 2 coming up.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
calicuz · 56-60, M
No, true history needs to be taught, not fake history where slave owners are "good people," because they were Christians, even though they owned Black Slaves.
bookerdana · M
@calicuz Mr Cal is in the room!
@calicuz so... where were you taught that?
calicuz · 56-60, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP

American schools
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz did you skip the chapter about the civil war?
calicuz · 56-60, M
@JohnnySpot

And how does that take away from the brutality of slavery during the first 90 years of this country?
@calicuz well I'm not American so I guess you'd know more about it than me. What do know is this is the very very very first time I've heard anything like that anywhere
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz Why are you singling out the United States? Slavery has been going on since the beginning of time to this day.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
calicuz · 56-60, M
@JohnnySpot @Charity

It's not about "picking on the United States," it's about getting my countrymen to admit the truth of American history. We accept the brutality, it's those in denial that reject it, and those are the ones that can't be trusted.
calicuz · 56-60, M
@Charity

All you say is true, and that's all we want is the truth.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz The truth about the Dahomey empire?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz The truth about pre-colonial Africa? The truth about where most of the slaves went? The truth about who did the enslaving? The truth about who ended the slave trade in Africa?
The truth about every different culture that has been enslaved?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
The truth about the 360,000 soldiers who died fighting to end slavery in the United States?@calicuz
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz The truth about Tipu Tip (Hamed Bin Mohammed Al-Murjebi) and the far worse atrocities committed by Arabs that dwarf the United States
slave trade?
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz The truth about how Anglo-Saxons (white people) are the heroes of abolishing worldwide slavery?
calicuz · 56-60, M
@JohnnySpot

Stop defending murderers, it's very unbecoming, and why no mention of the 300,000 plus black Slaves who fought in the revolutionary war, and who were rewarded for their patriotism by being put back into chains.
Charity · 70-79
@calicuz

I don't think you're picking on the United States, you're telling the truth as am I.

And it goes further than that with the native / indigenous American Indians that first settled this land and what they did to them and from what I'm learning they sold a lot of them into slavery in Europe. White out tribes of people from an estimated 35 million down to an estimated 5 million a censor showed 10 years ago. And the government will say 11 to 12 million other reports differ, then the US uses 11 to 12 million in their counts like they did with black slavery 11 to 12 million in other reports say anywhere from 65 to 100 million.

If they were brutal here they were brutal in Britain, and France, Switzerland and some other countries we just don't hear about it.
Charity · 70-79
@JohnnySpot

That's probably where the British got the idea of slave trade from the Arab slave trade started in the 7th century and lasted into the beginning of the 20th century. They like the British took the land, took the culture, sold the people and claim it as their own.

The difference is America don't teach what Arabs did or other countries did barely teach what America did.
Charity · 70-79
@JohnnySpot

One thing about America, American lies.

And the British may have tricked and paid Black Africans to capture other Black Africans with trinkets and things they never seen are used before.

According to Africans Africa did not enslave people as the Arabs and British did. They were Incorporated or in servitude but the brutality was absent. And a servant could go free after debt was paid.

They knew nothing of the type of brutal slavery that the people were placed into, ignorance to the ways of the British and the Arabs were accepted on a friendly basis to live among them but in their ignorance the Arabs enslaved them.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz Approximately 20,000 black men fought in the revolutionary war with roughly 3/4 for the British and 1/4 for the Americans. The American army never exceeded 90,000 and the British had 50,000 rethink your 300,000 black slaves who fought nonsense @Charity Where are you getting your information from? African Kings were far more brutal to Africans than anybody else except Arabs. Tricked with trinkets? See my prior replies and research it a little bit, it's not hidden information.
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@calicuz If you're talking about the revolutionary war between 1775 and 1783 there were 450,000 to 500,000 slaves in the United States at that time. Rethink your 300,000 black slaves fought in the revolutionary war nonsense.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@Charity There is nothing false in any of my replies here and or what they imply.
Charity · 70-79
@JohnnySpot

Same applies here!