Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If What The Skeptics Believe Is True, Then Where's Their Evidence?

[media=https://youtu.be/Nz2Fuc-Vk-g]

[media=https://youtu.be/Y6SQHwMMyo0]

[media=https://youtu.be/Y7ZATMal_XQ]

It's really sad to see skeptics trying to push their delusion into reality. We must continue to pray for them.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I believe the Earth is FAR older than the Biblical 6000 years, and here is my evidence!!

Visit any limestone cave. Stalactites grow at a rate of about 1mm per 10 years. So a 10 meter stalactite has been growing about 100,000 years. And close examination of cross sections shows the year by year layering (where rainfall is seasonal). These stalactites can be found all over the world. The ages are corroborated by radiometric carbon dating.

Tree rings are clocks. The oldest living tree goes back about 4800 years. But wood from dead trees can contain records of volcanic events, thus extending the record back much farther.
Originally developed for climate science, the method is now an invaluable tool for archaeologists, who can track up to 13,000 years of history using tree ring chronologies for over 4,000 sites on six continents.
The ages are corroborated by radiometric carbon dating (establishing age by measuring ratios of radioactive vs stable isotopes).

Seasonal snowfall on glaciers accumulates to form countable layers. Greenland ice sheet layers can be counted back about 110,000 years. The ages are corroborated by radiometric dating. Other glaciers go back as far as 700,000 years, but on those the older data is mostly radiometric dating.

Salt flows from rocks into lakes and the ocean. If no salt left the ocean, that would give an age of 50 million to 70 million years. However, various geologic processes cause salt to leave the ocean at about the rate it's entering, so 50 million to 70 million years becomes a minimum estimate of the age of the earth.

Layering of sedimentary rocks - such as in the Grand Canyon - forms a series of clocks. These layers correspond to different stages in the evolution of life on the planet. The layers can be dated by positional order (bottom layer formed first), sedimentation rate, age of fossils found in the layer, and of course, radiometric dating. There are five main isotope pairs used for dating sedimentary rocks as well as the 'fissile track' method; you can read about it all here:
https://australian.museum/learn/minerals/shaping-earth/radioactive-dating/


Then there's all the fossils of extinct animals found in the rock layers. They're not exactly a clock, but they are an indicator of the vast amounts of time over which evolution occurs.

Of course outer space offers many clocks. Accumulation of craters on airless bodies like the Moon forms a clock. Shells of glowing gas left over from novas and supernovas form clocks (the Lambda Orionis Ring is about 1 million years old). The redshift of light from galaxies billions of light years away form clocks. The Hubble expansion of the universe forms a clock. The frequency shift of big bang radiation to form the cosmic microwave background is a clock.

No one clock is perfect, but they all corroborate each other pretty well, and they ALL give life FAR MORE than 6000 years to evolve.

If you argue "God hid those dinosaur bones (and all the isotopes used for dating) in the rocks" I can't disprove it. If you argue "God built all those layers into the glaciers and into stalactites, made the nova remnants appear millions of years old, etc." I can't disprove it. But you've got to ask yourself, why would God put all these inter-corroborating clocks all over the Earth and all thru the galaxy if they were all false???
Carazaa · F
@ElwoodBlues

I can't disprove all that. However, what I do know is that God can change the way things appear. so why would he do that? For a few reasons. For one he wants to test our faith. Faith is important to God. Two big events changed the world naturally.

First, God cursed the ground in the Garden of Eden because we sinned. He changed the world to deteriorate quickly. Before garden of Eden, there were no diseases, no floods, earthquake, or deterioration. After the curse the world has been plagued by many events to remind us of our sins.

Then there is Noahs flood, the biggest event that has created a lot of mysteries for scientist, but not really for Biblical scholars. such as boulders rolling down mountains for miles and ending up on top of each other on plains far from mountains. And marine life and seashells on top of mountains far from the sea. It did not explain "the Ice age,". Petrification happens quickly like a flood, mud on top of animals, etc. not slowly.

what is fascinating to me is that much of the stuff scientist are surprised to find, Biblical scholars expected to find like "Dogger land" in the North Sea, and trees under Pacific Ocean by Canada. It is expected that we would find civilization under water from before the flood, but scientist are surprised. Then they come up with such hilarious explanations that always contradict Gods word. They love to "disprove The Bible it seems.

No, I'll count on God's word as being absolutely correct. Especially since every single family in the Bible is named from Adam to Jesus, 4000 years. Jesus lived 2000 years ago. probably born year 6 BC and died and rose year 28 AD. About year 2028 it will be 6000 years since Adam lived, the first human, when he comes back from all the signs we see now.

God is giving us a timetable so we can endure these hard times, praise God he is in control.


I am writing this for those who do not know the Bible and automatically believe that the Bible can be contradicted. But I believe it can't if you study it.
(oh, my laptop is having sticky key problems so some words might be missing letters)
@Carazaa I know some religious scientists. I think they interpret some parts of the bible as being metaphors or parables and other parts as being literally true. "Four corners of the Earth" is a metaphor; nobody believes there are four actual corners out there. I think my religious friends have no trouble interpreting the Genesis creation story as a parable and not literally true.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues
I believe the Earth is FAR older than the Biblical 6000 years, and here is my evidence!!

The evidence you've shown only shows your miscalculation in the layers.
@GodSpeed63 says
The evidence you've shown only shows your miscalculation in the layers.
Please, enlighten us about these layers! But first, are you referring to the layers in stalactites? Or the layers in hundreds of glacier cores? Or maybe the layers in the Grand Canyon?? So many different layers have been found and measured, ALL indicating a much older Earth than the Biblical 6000 years.

And we haven't even gotten to stratigraphic layers in the Alps! Or million year old supernova remnants!!

Your problem, @GodSpeed63, is that there are SO MANY different independent "clocks" on Earth and in space. A single complaint about unspecified "layers" isn't going to cut the mustard.

[media=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christoph-Leitner/publication/318494921/figure/fig2/AS:613852794322972@1523365319775/Stratigraphic-chart-of-the-Northern-Calcareous-Alps-in-a-simplified-traverse-from-more.png]
Carazaa · F
@ElwoodBlues

I understand that some people call themselves Christian and have metaphorical interpretation of verses that most Christians believe are profoundly important timelines.


"I declare the end, from the beginning"
God tells us. Isaiah 36:10 so if we study Genesis, we will have knowledge of the end because God gives us clues of the end in Genesis.

However, even if you don't believe that timeline, please be careful because Christian scientists do not believe Jesus is Gods son who died for our sins, nor that he rose from the dead. They are not what Jesus himself would call "Christians"

There is no forgiven for sin unless we believe he died for our sins and rose from the dead.
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues
And we haven't even gotten to stratigraphic layers in the Alps! Or million year old supernova remnants!!

So? You can all through the layers in the heavens and the earth, if you'd like, and you'd still miss the mark.