Are These Debates Based On What's Right Or Who's Right?

Part of coming to the LORD is to face conviction about ones transgressions against His will..

A lot of people cannot bare going through this process,, pride gets in the way and people prefer to embrace lies that pander to their desires rather then the truth which makes them feel guilty and unworthy..

Thats why the Bible says that the Meek shall inherit the earth and that God resisteth the proud but gives grace to the humble..

But it is also true that some of the proud, some of the big shots in this world have faced the worst this world can offer and had their pride kicked out of them, Sometimes the world humbles people and that opens them up to be saved.. It's a hard road to be smashed to pieces, a hard way to salvation... But in the end if one is saved one has EVERYTHING that one could ever desire and Way Way more.. 🤗

I believe God guided the process of evolution, reconciling the biblical creation narrative with scientific understanding of biological diversity.

Many early prominent historical scientists, like Copernicus and Galileo, saw their work as a way to glorify God.

The idea that science can coexist and even complement God's Word, shows that scientific discovery can be seen as a way to understand and appreciate the intricate design of the natural world created by God, rather than contradicting religious texts. Science is a tool to explore God's creation further.

Another key point to remember, is that
Science focuses on the physical world and observable phenomena, while we explore spiritual and existential questions, allowing us to address different aspects of reality, without direct conflict. God, as Creator, is seen as the ultimate source of the universe, and science is viewed as a way to study and understand the mechanisms and laws God established within creation.

I believe our ability to conduct scientific inquiry, is a gift from God, allowing humans to gain deeper knowledge about the world around us.

That's irrelevant as what's right changes based on situation and perception. Like for instance I don't think sending people to hell for not worshipping is considered moral but lots of Christians think that. And they'd think they're right. There's lots of arguments to be made in the case for moral subjectivity.

Likewise, both people can be right but for different reasons, there's always the possibility that there's no fixed argument or way to go about something.

A debate is always about what is right. When you want to know who is right, it is called argument.