Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400F. Supp. 2d707 (M.D. Pa. 2005)
JudgeJohn E. Jones III
Justice Jones wrote (in part): For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the religious nature of ID [intelligent design] would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child.
1. The evidence at trial demonstrates that ID is [b]nothing less than the progeny of creationism[/b]. 2. The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, [b]a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory[/b]. 3. [b]ID is not science[/b]. 4. We find that ID fails on three different levels, any one of which is sufficient to preclude a determination that ID is science. They are: (a) ID violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation; (b) the argument ofirreducible complexity, central to ID, employs the same [b]flawed and illogical contrived dualism[/b] that doomed creation science in the 1980s; and (c) ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the scientific community. ... It is additionally important to note that ID has failed to gain acceptance in the scientific community, it has not generated peer-reviewed publications, nor has it been the subject of testing and research.
You creatonists had a wonderful opportunity... in open court... to prove your claims, yet all you did was obfuscate and whine and tell, to quote Justice Jones verbatim, [b]"lies under oath"[/b]
But then again, disingenuity, deception, and lies, don't seem to be problems for creationists... or are they a Jehovah's Witness specialty?
Let's look at some more of your video offerings in this post...
