Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Do The Skeptics Take The Chance At Being Wrong When They Don't Have To?

Why is it so important to them to take that chance? Has their delusions been so real to them that, even though they have no evidence or facts to support their delusions, to stick with them? They keep demanding my brothers and sisters and I to prove that God is alive and His Word is Truth by pulling this burden of proof nonsense on us. Why can't they see the fact that, since God already has proven Himself to mankind by His Word and His Work, the burden of proof is on them instead of us?





They see the evidence but they will not accept it as evidence. They want to believe that this came about by some freak accident and allow the fairy tale of evolution to take over in their distorted thinking. What are they afraid of? Why do they run when faced with the Truth? Don't they know that God doesn't wish to harm them when they humble themselves and seek His Face?




It's certain that they are afraid of hell fire. They want to believe that hell doesn't exist. In order to accomplish this, they must also believe that God doesn't live, or even heaven doesn't exist. They'll probably read this and laugh and mock and ridicule, but, they'll never prove what they want to believe is true. Hell was not meant for man at all, it was meant for the devil and his angels. Unfortunately, a lot people believe that it was meant for man as well, which isn't true.


God hates this because letting some of His beloved creation enter into hell breaks His heart. People don't realize that when they enter hell, that they'll discover, what God already knows, that it's a place of torment which no man or woman could with stand.



Their heart knowledge seeks after the Truth of God and not the lies of men.


Again, why would skeptics want to take the chance at being wrong when they don't have to?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Who says skeptics are wrong? That's just your opinion
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@SatanBurger The basis of his lies is the assumption that whatever he says is true... simply because he says it.
@SatanBurger No. It's God's opinion. There are only two ways to respond to God's wisdom: to listen or to "turn away." Either one is a choice. God said nobody will have an excuse: wisdom is made available... all we have to do is choose to listen.

2 Timothy 4:3-4
"For the time will come when doubters will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts, shall they heap to themselves false teachers, having itching ears; and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables."
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@LadyGrace no it's your opinion only.
@SatanBurger God wrote the Bible, not me, so it's his opinion and it's not a suggestion. Our souls live forever and it's up to us to decide where we want our souls to spend eternity and if we miss that, we have missed everything. There's no way we can save ourselves. Not one of us, except through Jesus, and that's what He teaches in His Word, which we would all do well to listen to, every one of us. This is not a contest nor argument. It's not about that. It's about making sure we all get to heaven.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@LadyGrace Actually priests who claim to hear voices of God wrote the Bible. I just wanted to correct you
@SatanBurger If you want to believe the lies of Satan, that's up to you, but I don't.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@LadyGrace ah so God wrote all versions of the Bible and then put it in every motel room, every church and just gave the Bible already written to multiple priests, preachers, followers? He just wrote the Bible and it popped out of thin air.

Yeah if logic is the devil.
@SatanBurger that wasn't the issue was it?

Actually priests who claim to hear voices of God wrote the Bible.

That's not what God's Word says.

How did you expect the Bible to be distributed throughout the world, but by translation of it into the different languages?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 @SatanBurger
The basis of his lies is the assumption that whatever he says is true... simply because he says it

How do you know they're lies? What's the basis for your conclusions?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Didn't you read this "The basis of his lies is the assumption that whatever he says is true... simply because he says it"

Now... Wrong about what?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
Didn't you read this "The basis of his lies is the assumption that whatever he says is true... simply because he says it"
Now... Wrong about what?

There is no basis for any of your conclusions. I figured as much.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Didn't you read this "The basis of his lies is the assumption that whatever he says is true... simply because he says it"

Now... Wrong about what?

Add: What ''conclusions'?

Do you understand that you've writing words, or do you just peck at the keyboard and hope that some of what comes out will have some sort of coherence and relevance.

Have you noticed that people respond to that by using coherent and relevant words, or are you committed to totally ignoring what they write, and pretending it didn't happen?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
Do you understand that you've writing words, or do you just peck at the keyboard and hope that some of what comes out will have some sort of coherence and relevance.

You're not here to find the Truth, you're just here to argue until your heart's content. Good day to you.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 I will always question unsupported claims.

You find that inconvenient for your efforts to disseminate your unsupported claims of choice, but that in no way allows you to avoid your burden of proof.

That's why it's called a burden... there's no avoiding it, and it requires you to do something about it.

If you cannot, or will not, carry that burden then your claims can be dismissed out of hand... and rightly so.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
I will always question unsupported claims.

Then question your own while your at it. Remember, belief follows Truth and not the other way around. The burden of proof is on you and it will always be on you. That's why it's called a burden... there's no avoiding it, and it requires you to do something about it. If you cannot, or will not, carry that burden then your claims can be dismissed out of hand... and rightly so. Good day to you.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 and yet again I will ask you.... what claims?

and yet again you will run away
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@newjaninev2 Hey! Over here! (snaps fingers impatiently)

This way! Pay attention!

What claims?

Answer the question, or go
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
and yet again I will ask you.... what claims?

You're not suited for this are you? You're supposed to be a scientist and you can't figure things out on your own? Good day to you.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 You really don't like being called out on your lies, huh?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
You really don't like being called out on your lies, huh?

Dream on. Good day to you.
@GodSpeed63 Exactly. She's just another troll. Do like me....block. 👍
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Haha I haven't been on this forum and lady grace blocked me, good to know she couldn't answer my questions.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@newjaninev2 amazing how they have so much trouble with answering a basic question
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@SatanBurger
amazing how they have so much trouble with answering a basic question

Which is?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@SatanBurger It's standard procedure for JWs... questions are complete anathema to them.

All you'll get is disingenuity and pretence.