Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Thomas Merton

I have quite a lot of time for Thomas Merton, or Father Louis as he was known in his monastery - when he was there of course and not gallivanting about, having clandestine meetings with various worthies of diverse Faiths. Escaping under the Church radar.

Merton was rarely didactic in his writings, even in his published books. But it is in his Letters and Journals that a true light shines.

As he wrote in an introduction to a collection of his writings:-

[i]I have tried to learn in my writing a monastic lesson I could probably have not learned otherwise: to let go of my idea of myself, to take myself with more than one grain of salt................In religious terms, this is simply a matter of accepting life, and everything in life as a gift, and clinging to none of it, as far as you are able. You give some of it to others, if you can. Yet one should be able to share things with others without bothering too much about how they like it, either, or how they accept it. Assume they will accept it, if they need it. And if they don't need it, why should they accept it? That is their business. Let me accept what is mine and give them all their share, and go my way.

All life tends to grow like this, in mystery inscaped with paradox and contradiction, yet centered in its very heart, on the divine mercy..........[/i]

Or as Robbie Robertson says in his great song "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down":- [i]Just take what you need and leave the rest[/i]. (The only downside of this is the implications contained in the next line:- "But they should never have taken the very best". How do we ever know what is the "best"? A conundrum, and perhaps the heart of true Faith.)

But back to Father Louis, and to perhaps begin a few selections from his writings, here he is in a letter written to one correspondent, back in 1958 I believe:-

[i]I hate proselytizing. This awful buisness of making others just like oneself so that one is thereby "justified" and under no obligation to change himself. What a terrible thing this can be. The source of how many sicknesses in the world. The true Christian apostolate is nothing of this sort, a fact that Christians themselves have largely forgotten. I think it was......Tauler (or maybe Eckhart) who said in a sermon that even if the church were empty he would preach the sermon to the four walls because he had to. That is the true apostolic spirit, based not on the desire to make others conform, but in the desire to proclaim and announce the good tidings of God's infinite love. In this context the preacher is not a "converter" but merely a herald, a voice, and the Spirit of the Lord is left free to act as He pleases. But this has degenerated into a doctrine and fashion of "convert-makers" in which man exerts pressure and techniques (this awful business of "modern techniques of propaganda") upon his fellow man in order to make him, force him, bring him under a kind of charm that compels him to abandon his own integrity and his own freedom and yield to another man or another institution. Little do men realize that in such a situation the Holy Spirit is silent and inactive, or perhaps active against the insolence of man. Hence the multitude of honest and sincere men who "cannot accept" a message that is preached without respect for the Spirit of God or for the spirit of man.[/i]

As you can see, Merton never learnt the art of PC, so called gender inclusive language. Not sure whether that is good or bad.....😀

Well, that is it for now.

Have a good day.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
A lovely little backwater here, far from the madding crowd. I was thinking of the great friendship between Thomas Merton and D. T. Suzuki, which flowered through the "spirit of all truth" in our world of division and conflict.

Merton, a Christian whose fidelity to Christ is unquestionable, once wrote this to Suzuki and said that the missionaries of our Western World should have approached the East truly in the spirit of Christ. Not to convert, but to learn, with the recognition that God is ever present in each and every heart.

[i]The beginning of love is to let those we love be perfectly themselves, and not to twist them to fit our own image. Otherwise we love only the reflection of ourselves we find in them.
[/i]

Merton went on to say:-

[i]I want to speak for this Western world.................which has in past centuries broken in upon you and brought you our own confusion, our own alienation, our own decrepitude, our lack of culture, our lack of faith...........If I wept until the end of the world, I could not signify enough of what this tragedy means. If only we had thought of coming to you to learn something..............If only we had thought of coming to you and loving you for what you are in yourselves, instead of trying to make you over into our own image and likeness. For me it is clearly evident that you and I have in common and share most intimately precisely that which, in the eyes of conventional Westerners, would seem to separate us. The fact that you are a Zen Buddhist and I am a Christian monk, far from separating us, makes us most like one another. How many centuries is it going to take for people to discover this fact?......
[/i]

(Possibly quoted before, but bears repetition)

Once when Merton escaped from under the monastery wall (😀) he met up with Suzuki in New York. Near the end of their conversation Merton quoted the words of a South American theologian:- "Praise be to God that I am not good!". Suzuki responded:- "That is so important".

Theistic language, yet Suzuki, a non-theist, saw through the "word as text" and had drunk from the Living Words of the spirit of all truth that [i]blows where it will[/i] - and not according to human understanding or reasoning.

In an essay contained in "Zen and the Birds of Appetite" Merton writes this of Suzuki:-

[i]Speaking for myself, I can venture to say that in Dr. Suzuki, Buddhism finally became for me completely comprehensible, whereas before it had been a very mysterious and confusing jumble of words, images, doctrines, legends, rituals, buildings, and so forth. It seemed to me that the great and baffling cultural luxuriance which has clothed the various forms of Buddhism in different parts of Asia is the beautiful garment thrown over something quite simple.[/i]

And further:-

[i]But I did feel that I was speaking to someone who, in a tradition completely different from my own, had matured, had become complete and found his way. One cannot understand Buddhism until one meets it in this existential manner, in a person in whom it is alive. Then there is no longer a problem of understanding doctrines which cannot help being a bit exotic for a Westerner, but only a question of appreciating a value which is self-evident.[/i]

Yes. A value that is self-evident. Self-evident at least to those whose mind/hearts truly share the [i]Living Word [/i]and have not been corrupted by the "word as text" and their own time conditioned understandings.

May true Dharma continue.
No blame. Be kind. Love everything.