Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Thomas Merton

I have quite a lot of time for Thomas Merton, or Father Louis as he was known in his monastery - when he was there of course and not gallivanting about, having clandestine meetings with various worthies of diverse Faiths. Escaping under the Church radar.

Merton was rarely didactic in his writings, even in his published books. But it is in his Letters and Journals that a true light shines.

As he wrote in an introduction to a collection of his writings:-

[i]I have tried to learn in my writing a monastic lesson I could probably have not learned otherwise: to let go of my idea of myself, to take myself with more than one grain of salt................In religious terms, this is simply a matter of accepting life, and everything in life as a gift, and clinging to none of it, as far as you are able. You give some of it to others, if you can. Yet one should be able to share things with others without bothering too much about how they like it, either, or how they accept it. Assume they will accept it, if they need it. And if they don't need it, why should they accept it? That is their business. Let me accept what is mine and give them all their share, and go my way.

All life tends to grow like this, in mystery inscaped with paradox and contradiction, yet centered in its very heart, on the divine mercy..........[/i]

Or as Robbie Robertson says in his great song "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down":- [i]Just take what you need and leave the rest[/i]. (The only downside of this is the implications contained in the next line:- "But they should never have taken the very best". How do we ever know what is the "best"? A conundrum, and perhaps the heart of true Faith.)

But back to Father Louis, and to perhaps begin a few selections from his writings, here he is in a letter written to one correspondent, back in 1958 I believe:-

[i]I hate proselytizing. This awful buisness of making others just like oneself so that one is thereby "justified" and under no obligation to change himself. What a terrible thing this can be. The source of how many sicknesses in the world. The true Christian apostolate is nothing of this sort, a fact that Christians themselves have largely forgotten. I think it was......Tauler (or maybe Eckhart) who said in a sermon that even if the church were empty he would preach the sermon to the four walls because he had to. That is the true apostolic spirit, based not on the desire to make others conform, but in the desire to proclaim and announce the good tidings of God's infinite love. In this context the preacher is not a "converter" but merely a herald, a voice, and the Spirit of the Lord is left free to act as He pleases. But this has degenerated into a doctrine and fashion of "convert-makers" in which man exerts pressure and techniques (this awful business of "modern techniques of propaganda") upon his fellow man in order to make him, force him, bring him under a kind of charm that compels him to abandon his own integrity and his own freedom and yield to another man or another institution. Little do men realize that in such a situation the Holy Spirit is silent and inactive, or perhaps active against the insolence of man. Hence the multitude of honest and sincere men who "cannot accept" a message that is preached without respect for the Spirit of God or for the spirit of man.[/i]

As you can see, Merton never learnt the art of PC, so called gender inclusive language. Not sure whether that is good or bad.....😀

Well, that is it for now.

Have a good day.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
Reflecting upon the "different graces" and such, of Merton's insights into any book of meditations. There is a strong link to some words of the 13th century zen master Dogen, to be found in his "Genjokoan" (variously translated, but I like "The Actualisation of Reality")

Dogen's words:-

[i]Conveying oneself toward all things to carry out practice-enlightenment is delusion. All things coming and carrying out practice-enlightenment through the self is realization.[/i]

Living within a concrete, presumed "self" as the centre, I think we simply impose ourselves upon the world around us. We are virtually seeing a reflection. Yet "if a grain of wheat fall into the ground and dies", if we are "empty" and receptive, the grace of Reality can come to us, as it is, in and of itself. A constant advance into novelty. And although such can be thought of as passive, it is not so.

Correspondances can be found throughout our world of Faiths. The Christian mystic Meister Eckhart speaks of true obedience in his "Talks of Instructions".

Here is Eckhart:-

[i]In true obedience there should be no ‘I want this or that to happen’ or ‘I want this or that thing’ but only a pure going out of what is our own. And therefore in the very best kind of prayer that we can pray there should be no ‘give me this particular virtue or way of devotion’ or ‘yes, Lord, give me yourself or eternal life’, but rather ‘Lord, give me only what you will and do, Lord, only what you will and in the way that you will’. This kind of prayer is as far above the former as heaven is above earth. And when we have prayed in this way, then we have prayed well, having gone out of ourselves and entered God in true obedience. But just as true obedience should have no ‘I want this’, neither should it ever hear ‘I don’t want’, for ‘I don’t want’ is pure poison for all true obedience.[/i]

Seeking to distinguish between theism and non-theism seems often a pointless pursuit, at least within the mind/heart of experience.

The Great Way of the Hsin Hsin Ming:-

[i]The Great Way is not difficult for those who have no preferences. When like and dislike are both absent, everything becomes clear and undisguised. Make the smallest distinction, however, and heaven and earth are set infinitely apart. If you wish to see the truth, then hold no opinions for, or against, anything. To set up what you like against what you dislike is the disease of the mind. When the deep meaning of things is not understood, the mind's essential peace is disturbed to no avail.[/i]

Anyway, as said elsewhere, I tend to waffle.

Getting back to the "different graces" found in Thomas Merton's words, for me Grace is fundamental. Understood on a wide spectrum - as a gift from "Him up there", to the insight that we do not attain emptiness but are empty from the very beginning (an insight drawn from a dialogue between Merton and D T Suzuki) Such a spectrum takes in all, from the most literally minded to the most "mystical", from those who live in an "I-Thou" relationship with the divine to those who can say "Not I, but Christ lives in me"

So grace is one, yet differentiated in how it manifests.

It also relates to the true prayer spoken of by Eckhart, which is more a giving up of ourselves, rather than making requests. More seeking to allow God/Reality to play in us, rather than playing God ourselves.

So we can plan and anticipate, have our techniques for "gaining" salvation/enlightenment, look for our own justifications, seek to make our "self" a suitable case for the receipt of any gift from the divine. Or actually seek to be receptive to what is given, when given. Not recognised or known until given. So always new, and not what we may have expected. Never ours, only ever to be reflected back into the world, as gift and grace to others. Shared but never divided.

May true Dharma continue.
No blame. Be kind. Love everything.