Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Belief Follows Truth: The Truth: God Is The Victor And The Fallaciousness Of The Skeptics Will Soon End.




Skeptics keep asking for proof that God lives, yet they themselves prove He lives by failing to support their belief that he doesn't live.

Skeptics make fun of us for believing in God, yet they themselves fail to support their own beliefs and prove that He does live.

Skeptics keep saying that the Word of God is not reliable and full of fairy tales, yet they prove it to be true every single time by their own mouth.

Psalm 2:1-4

Why do the [a]nations [b]rage,
And the people plot a [c]vain thing?
2
The kings of the earth set themselves,
And the rulers take counsel together,
Against the Lord and against His Anointed,[d] saying,
3
“Let us break Their bonds in pieces
And cast away Their cords from us.”
4
He who sits in the heavens shall laugh;
The Lord shall hold them in derision.

The Skeptics ridicule, mock, and insult God and His children in vain signifying nothing.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
their belief that he doesn't live

1. there's no proof that gods exist
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist
3. in any event, there’s no compelling necessity to even postulate gods, and, in any event, the postulation explains nothing (not even itself)... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods (I’m an agnostic atheist)

Where in there do i express a belief that it doesn't live?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
1. there's no proof that gods exist

Prove it.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 lol! You seem frightened... why don't you address everything I posted, rather than trying to take snippets.

Go ahead... discuss the entire comment
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63
Prove it.

The fact that there are sick popes, cardinals, bishops, nuns, and preachers prove that there is no biblical God or Jesus.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 lol! You seem frightened... why don't you address everything I posted, rather than trying to take snippets.

Go ahead... discuss the entire comment
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 No? Don't want to do that?

So much for your god thing!
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
No

If you don't want to prove that Yahweh doesn't live, then the Truth remains that He does live.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
If you don’t believe us, go ahead and ask Cthulhu and Dagon yourself.
You can get it straight from old squid face himself.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 Why don't you prove your favorite delusion is real by simply doing what he said believers can do? I wonder why all of the clerics never healed themselves with prayers and magic oil? You could drink some poison but it's sure to kill you regardless of how much you believe in your delusion. Do you think you can hypnotize some poisonous snakes and wrap them around your body without being bitten? How are you doing with commanding a tree to uproot itself and to jump into the nearest body of water? Jesus said that was easy for a believer to do. So do it and then you might have a point.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63
prove that Yahweh doesn't live

Do you actually read anything that other people post... or are you simply frightened by me?

1. there's no proof that gods exist
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist
3. in any event, there’s no compelling necessity to even postulate gods, and, in any event, the postulation explains nothing (not even itself)... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods (I’m an agnostic atheist)

Where in there do i express a belief that it doesn't live?

You're revealing yourself to be a fraud
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2
1. there's no proof that gods exist

The dead can't see the work of God.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 That makes absolutely no sense.

If you can't have integrity (and apparently you can't), then at least try to be coherent
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63
prove that Yahweh doesn't live

Do you actually read anything that other people post... or are you simply frightened by me?

1. there's no proof that gods exist
2. there's no proof that gods don't exist
3. in any event, there’s no compelling necessity to even postulate gods, and, in any event, the postulation explains nothing (not even itself)... it merely tries to explain everything away.
4. therefore, I have no gods (I’m an agnostic atheist)

Where in there do I express a belief that it doesn't live?
HollyW · 18-21, F
@newjaninev2 Point 2 has been wrong for 2/3 of a century.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@HollyW
Point 2 has been wrong for 2/3 of a century.

Prove it.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@HollyW that proof being..?
HollyW · 18-21, F
@newjaninev2 Look to basic psychology and the impetuses for making choices. They can be accurately plotted on a quadrants map.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63
If you don't want to prove that Yahweh doesn't live, then the Truth remains that He does live.
Then if you don't want to, or can't, prove that The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live, then the Truth remains that It does live. r'Amen.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@HollyW how does that prove the existence of gods?
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Easy. Show it to us yourself.
You ain’t got it
Sharon · F
@newjaninev2 I think @HollyW means there is evidence that gods do not exist.
HollyW · 18-21, F
@Sharon That is correct.
HollyW · 18-21, F
@Sharon The intent is not to disprove the existence of God within a belief but to prove instead the veracity of a competing belief which by definition cannot include God. An investigation should be benign, and God should not be targeted. In this understanding the poster is right about requiring proof from naysayers- not that it could ever change the result in his favor.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@HollyW as I said, there’s no compelling necessity to even make the postulation - so no consideration or belief even arises.
We can all simply get on with our lives and go play tennis or something.
HollyW · 18-21, F
@newjaninev2 Unless there's something we need to do within a known true belief.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@HollyW Sorry, I have no idea what that means.

Whats a 'true' belief'?

If it's demonstrably true, then why the need for belief?