Belief Follows Truth: God Is Victorious Throughout The World! Amen And Amen!

@Ryderbike [quote]So now that I posted proof your Bible is a fairytale, what’s your response?[/quote]

You haven't proved anything, Ryder, except that you're a poor speller and that your ignorant of God's Word.

@GodSpeed63 name the two great lights . If you can’t the Bible is a myth

@Ryderbike [quote]name the two great lights . If you can’t the Bible is a myth[/quote]

Already answered that question. Tell me: where did life itself originated from? If you can't then evolution is a myth. Okay?

@GodSpeed63 no you didn’t. The moon isn’t a light.

Name the two great lights

@Ryderbike [quote]no you didn’t[/quote]

Answer my question.

@GodSpeed63 right after you name the 2 great lights.

I’ll be happy to answer

@GodSpeed63 [quote]where did life itself originated from? [/quote]

Abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics.

I have explained this to you several times.

It is now apparent that you are being wilfully ignorant... that it is a choice, rather than a condition.

Such behaviour is unethical... duplicitous and dishonest.

It seems that you think it’s very christian to use deceit and falsehoods... that your gods approve of such behaviour.

Well, here it is yet again... [b]Abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics.[/b]

Abiogenesis is how life originated.

Evolution is what happens [i]after[/i] abiogenesis.

Note that if something cannot exist until something else exists, then they [i][b]cannot[/b][/i] be the same thing.

Of course, like everyone else here, I fully realise that your deceit, lies, and unethical behaviour will continue... you consistently demonstrate that your gods require you to behave that way.

You will continue to lie to us, but it would be nice if you at least stopped lying to yourself.

@newjaninev2 [quote]Abiogenesis is how life originated.[/quote]

According to whom?

[quote]Evolution is what happens after abiogenesis.[/quote]

How do you know?

@Ryderbike @newjaninev2 [quote]right after you name the 2 great lights.[/quote]

Since you deem my answer to be wrong, Ryder, then tell me what you think the right answer is.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]According to whom?[/quote]

Abiogenesis isn’t a particular process... it the word that [i]refers[/i] to how life begins.

It isn’t a process... it's the [i]name[/i] of the process.

Now stop pretending there’s nothing else there to answer.

Stop lying.

[b]Abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics[/b]

Do you agree?

Or do you need to continue lying?

[quote]How do you know?[/quote].

[b]Abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics[/b]

Abiogenesis refers to [b]how[/b] life originated...

Evolution refers to what happens [b]after[/b] abiogenesis.

Do you agree?

Or do you need to continue lying?

@GodSpeed63 the right answer is there are not 2 great lights

@newjaninev2 [quote]Abiogenesis isn’t a particular process... it the word that refers to how life begins.[/quote]

You tell me nothing.

[quote]Abiogenesis and evolution are two different topics[/quote]

Again, you tell me nothing. Your world views do not line up with science.

@Ryderbike [quote]the right answer is there are not 2 great lights[/quote]

The right answer, I have already given. You're not a scientist are you Ryder?

@GodSpeed63 science proved long ago the moon is not a light.

Usually learned in grade school,

@GodSpeed63 [quote]You tell me nothing[/quote]

You deny knowing he meaning off the word ‘abiogenesis’, yet now you say that you knew the meaning all along.

Are you being deliberately [b]deceptive[/b], or are you trying to hide woeful ignorance?

[b]Which is it?[/b]

[quote]Your world views do not line up with science[/quote]

This has nothing to do with ‘world views’, whatever those are supposed to be (is that your way of referring to whatever convenience fiction you make up from time to time?)

Abiogenesis occurs without any evolution, because It is not possible for evolution to occur until [i][b]after[/b][/i] abiogenesis has occurred.

You cannot age and die until after you are conceived.

That’s a simple reality, and is nothing to do with science.

Are you being deliberately [b]disingenuous[/b], or are you trying to hide woeful ignorance?

[b]Which is it?[/b]

@GodSpeed63 Its time for you and your silly little gods to run away again.

@newjaninev2 [quote] Its time for you and your silly little gods to run away again.[/quote]

Look at it this way: you and science don't agree on the conclusions.

@GodSpeed63 on the contrary, I fully accept the conclusions that science draws from the evidence… and so do you.

Yes?

You accept the conclusions that science draws from the evidence, don’t you?

Or do you have a different yet complete, consistent, and coherent, explanation for the evidence?

If so, please present it now.

@newjaninev2 [quote]on the contrary, I fully accept the conclusions that science draws from the evidence… and so do you. [/quote]

That's true but science still points to God and not evolution as the evidence clearly states.

@GodSpeed63 The explanation for the evidence… the explanation that you and I both accept… directly contradicts and refutes creationists’ claims, and had no need of them.

That explanation is the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.

It’s good that we now agree on that.

@GodSpeed63

" Your world views do not line up with science."

That would be some answer even if wrong if you had a just moderate idea of what Science is.
But yo make a good job making clear you don´t.