Evolution's Achilles' Heels

[media=https://youtu.be/sN7v-ec0jcw]

This video is to challenge non-believing scientist with the Truth. The scientists in this video have shown why evolution has Achilles' heels. A bit of a warning, do not give your worldly opinions on here. They don't count.

Well folks, So far, this video goes unchallenged; a lot of ranting and raving, but, no evidence or facts. Makes me wonder if these guys are serious about what they believe.

Ladies and gentlemen, here is an update on the video challenge. No challenge has yet been made by the opposing side. So far they have thrown tantrums but have made no real research to attempt to refute the scientists in this video. One of two reasons is that they can't come up with enough support for their claims. The second reason is that they've discovered the fact that the scientists in the video are telling the Truth about science being the product of Creator God. The rest are lame excuses that will not hold water.

Well folks, I'm back with another victory for this video. It seems that the opposing team can't come up with any kind challenge to refute it or the scientists that give testimony to the Achilles' heels in evolution. Most likely they are afraid of getting ridiculed by their peers, plus, being judged stupid or insane if they even attempt to watch video with an open mind.

Ladies and gentlemen, the winner for this round goes to the scientists in this video since they were never challenged by the opposing team.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ninalanyon · 61-69, T

I watched the trailer.

The trailer says that carbon dating isn't any use for dating articles in the deep past. But no one ever claimed that it was. A National Geographic article puts the practical limit at about 60 thousand years. See https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/radiocarbon-dating-explained

This statement from one of the anonymous talking heads stood out to me in the Ethics section:
[quote]If the creator made us then he owns us and has the right to make the rules for us.[/quote]
This is presented as though it is a fact, but it is merely an assertion.

It looks as first sight as though it has the form of a syllogism that tries to say that A made B so A rules over B.

But it boils down to a pair of assumptions presented as universal truths but which are easily seen to not be universal:
"A made B therefore A owns B": Builders make houses but they generally do not own them.
"A owns B therefore A rules over B": I own my own house, yet there is a long list of things that I cannot legally do with it.

But even if the statement could somehow be rescued from error It is also completely beside the point when discussing the supposed "Achilles' Heels of Evolution" because evolution makes no ethical claims.

[quote]In case I didn't make myself clear enough, this video was put on her to refute evolution.[/quote]
You have only posted the trailer. If you really wanted people to comment on the whole film you should have posted that.

[quote]It has yet to be challenged by those 'would be scientists' on here.[/quote]
There isn't anything in the trailer that a scientist could challenge from a scientific point of view because it is merely a set of talking heads spouting unsupported claims that are too vague to be meaningful, straw men, or simply statements of faith.

[quote] 'would be scientists'[/quote]
Perhaps insulting your audience works as a way of encouraging people in religious circles but in rational circles it just puts peoples' backs up.