Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Humans Evolved and That's That - DeBunked

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBH9DGw0_eg]

The evolution of man is debunked. Evolution itself is debunked. By failing to support their claims, these skeptics share in debunking their own beliefs of the lie of evolution when they are faced with the Truth of God. God still loves them no less than He loves us. One last thought: claims are different from testimonies. There will always be uncertainty in claims but never in testimonies for they bear witness to the Truth of God.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
This is so silly like act your age
GodSpeed63 · 70-79, M
@TryingtoLava
This is so silly like act your age

What do you think I'm doing?
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63
What do you think I'm doing?
Being childish.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWjVFs9o5vs]
SW-User
@DocSavage Bill Nye is such a government tool. If you're honest, you'll admit he isn't a real scientist. He's another one of these celebrity shills of the science fiction religion like Neil Degrasse Tyson.

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWxgSGE3rWU]
Sharon · F
@SW-User ROFLMAO!
Bill Nye is an engineer with a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering and honorary doctorates from several universities.

Kent Hovind is a rather unsavory character with criminal convictions, including for violence. His "qualifications" are from a diploma mill. Even other creationists distance themselves from him.
SW-User
@Sharon And yet, Kent Hovind is still far smarter than Bill Nye. George W Bush graduated from Harvard. Doesn't mean much. Most of the greatest minds in history did not have degrees. In fact, they were bad at school. I don't care about diplomas, degrees, (and honorary degrees are a joke btw) or any of that. The important question here is who is right? You're using a logical fallacy which is called appeal to authority, to evade learning and investigating the truth.

Criminal convictions like opposing taxes which are theft, right? Taxes are what's criminal. The government has no right to take by force and coercion that which we work hard for, and use it for what? Well, many useless things, like for instance, bombing brown countries and killing innocent families and children. Anyone who is so under mind control that they continue to believe that taxation is not theft, well go ahead and continue to believe that, you're delusional and fooling yourself. A regular person doesn't have the right to just take from someone else what doesn't belong to them, so why does the government have that right? It is taking from someone who you don't have a right to take from. The ego needs to step aside to understand a lot of this.
Sharon · F
@SW-User
Kent Hovind is still far smarter than Bill Nye.
ROFLMAO! Not a chance.

You're using a logical fallacy which is called appeal to authority, to evade learning and investigating the truth.
Not at all. Science is based on reason. Kent Hovind is a fantasist. He was also recently convicted of assaulting his estranged wife.

He makes a big deal of science not being able to say where everything came from. That's simply scientists being honest. He fails to explain where his god came from however so he's a hypocrite too.
DocSavage · M
@SW-User
What planet are you living on ?
DocSavage · M
@SW-User
Not a real scientist?
Are you saying the science he demonstrated isn’t real, or that it’s not real unless presented by a “real scientist “
Narcissistic, as I said before. The by product of religion. Along with ignorance.
SW-User
@Sharon Actually, Kent has directly answered the question where our God comes from already. Here it is:

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3kWO3qeKKs]
Sharon · F
@SW-User Yet he can't see that the same explanation can be applied to the quantum singularity the expanded to form the universe we know. His god is a totally unnecessary postulate, a complete waste of time.
DocSavage · M
@Sharon
He still didn’t say where god came from , or how he influences a material universe, he just said what would be needed . That doesn’t answer anything.
Sharon · F
@DocSavage I noticed, he just rambled on carefully avoiding the real question. Typical christian obfuscation.