To creationists: How do you account for the existence of a number of human species? [Spirituality & Religion]

@Svarog: No, congruent is proper.

@HoraceGreenley

Well that's all well and good. It's hard to refute the body of evidence that suggests a non literal interpretation of genesis.
But i'm asking this question of creationists

@UnparalleledMonster: I understand. I just wanted to throw in my 2 cents as a Catholic that believes in Biological Evolution.

I'm on your side.

Besides, i've forgotten more about evolution than most people will ever know.

Good meeting a practicing Catholic with a working brain... I mean I always knew you were around, but the stupider tend to be louder, due to media and human nature. Wonder if you'd go as far as me in proposing: certainty of your own righteousness and bothering others about your religion is Christ-killing Phariseeism, while humility and helping the rejects of society is living in Christ... whatever your religion or lack thereof???

@Svarog: Congruence involves relationship, while consistency implies exact similarity. Horace is right.