Science Still Points To A Young Earth

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPQNhMVSMy0]

Evolution scientists must rely on the earth being billions of years old in spite of the fact that the earth is only thousands of years old. Otherwise, their belief in evolution would fall apart.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Carazaa · F

Scientists say that billions of tons of debris, dead plankton etc accumulate annually in the ocean and there are kilometers of sediment on the ocean floor. If the ocean had been around millions of years the ocean would not be livable. No its 6000 years old just like the Bible says. There is NO proof of any old earth.

Entwistle · 56-60, M

@Carazaa Insanity is what you preach.

SW-User

@Carazaa We cannot rule that out Carazaa. According to Hindu texts this universe was present millions and billions of years back. The ancient Hindu texts considers time as cyclic and divided into 4 yugas. You know right, scientific evidence proved life beyond 6000 years? The current time period/yuga is approximately is 6000 years old and that may be the reference pointed by Bible. Biblical reference may also not be wrong. It is just that it considers only the current time period. At the end of every yuga Earth undergoes destruction and reconstruction. I am not a scholar on this topic though, however the concept of yugas makes a lot of sense to me.

SW-User

@Carazaa True. There are only speculations and no proof for old earth.
👏 You have a great point. Absolutely logical!
"Scientists say that billions of tons of debris, dead plankton etc accumulate annually in the ocean and there are kilometers of sediment on the ocean floor. If the ocean had been around millions of years the ocean would not be livable. "

SW-User

@SW-User [quote]The ancient Hindu texts considers time as cyclic and divided into 4 yugas. You know right, scientific evidence proved life beyond 6000 years? [/quote] cyclic time ? That's not true. Do you have any proofs?
[quote]The current time period/yuga is approximately is 6000 years old and that may be the reference pointed by Bible.[/quote] Bible has no relation to hindu texts whatsoever. Such claims are baseless. First and foremost, Bible is not mythology. It is the word of God.

Entwistle · 56-60, M

@SW-User Oceans like all things are constantly changing.
Creatures evolve.

Entwistle · 56-60, M

@SW-User The bible is a collection of fables and nonsense. As are the hindu and muslim holy books.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@Entwistle [quote]The bible is a collection of fables and nonsense.[/quote]

You keep saying it, Entwistle, but you've never been able to prove it to be true.

Entwistle · 56-60, M

@GodSpeed63 It being a bag of crap doesn't need me to prove it. It's a bag of crap independent of proof.

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@Entwistle [quote] It's a bag of crap independent of proof.[/quote]

So you have nothing, Entwistle, and your statement is null and void. Has it ever occurred to you, Entwistle, that every time you refuse to back up your claims, that you make yourself out to be a liar?