The Delusion of Atheism [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaQpENJLx-I]

The main delusion of atheism is that its followers believe that it exists.

They are deluded into believing that no gods exist, yet they have their own gods that they worship and put their faith in.

They can't understand that there is only one true God, Yahweh, who has revealed Himself to mankind through His Spirit and through His Word, yet they try their darnedest to discredit Him and His Word instead of taking time to understand Him and His Word.

They keep claiming they have evidence for their type of science that evolution happened instead of God, Yahweh, creating the heavens and the earth but fail to produce evidence so far. They, however, have shown evidence that intelligent design happened instead but still claim it's evolution.

They mock, ridicule, and insult hoping that these actions will set them above those who believe, on the contrary, the opposite happens and their mocking, ridiculing, and insults fall back on them. Plus, these actions prove that they have no such evidence to support their claims in that evolution happened or that God, Yahweh, doesn't live.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

In fact, 'atheism' is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a 'non-astrologer' or a 'non-alchemist'. We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.
[i]Sam Harris[/i]

Thodsis · 51-55, M

@newjaninev2 'Atheist' is a word that's much better used as an adjective rather than a noun.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Thodsis That’s definitely the case with ‘agnostic’. its use as a noun causes confusion, whereas its use as an adjective lends clarity. I’m an agnostic atheist.

Thodsis · 51-55, M

@newjaninev2 I'd always believed or 'had faith' that being without a god was described as being atheist. In the same way that the word humourless is used. ;)

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@Thodsis Yes, I have no gods. After all, why would I [i]have[/i] gods?

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 [quote]After all, why would I have gods?[/quote]

You tell me. After all you worship an idol or idols that take the place of the one true God in your heart.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 No, I won’t tell you... because there’s nothing to tell. [i]There’s no reason to have gods.[/i]

While you’re here and available.... is there any chance you’ll ever stand by your words and actually respond to this from below?

[quote]evidence for their type of science that evolution happened[/quote]

Leaving aside whatever it is you think you mean by ‘their type of science’ (?????)... would you like to see some evidence for the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection?

You know... the evidence you’ve been shown several times and and run away from several times

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 [quote]No, I won’t tell you... because there’s nothing to tell. [/quote]

Of course there's nothing to tell, but, they're still your gods regardless.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 [quote]they're still your gods regardless[/quote]

is that one of your usual ‘simply because I say so’ pronouncements?

Nothing to back it up, as usual...

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 [quote]is that one of your usual ‘simply because I say so’ pronouncements?[/quote]

No, it's the truth. Speaking of back ups, where's yours for your claims?

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 So your response to the suggestion that you have made yet another ‘simply because I say so’ pronouncement is to make [i]yet another[/i] ‘because I say so’ pronouncement?

Really?

[quote]Speaking of back ups, where's yours for your claims?[/quote]

Which claims are those? [b]Please detail them.[/b] Your predictable vague allusions and non-specific mumblings won’t help you here.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 [quote]Which claims are those?[/quote]

You're supposed to be brilliant? What have you been claiming all along in posts, newjaninev?

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 Atheists can't ask logical questions being that they're dead in the ground and I'm not religious.

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 So you’re [i]still[/i] insisting that someone who doesn’t have something that you invent doesn’t exist

...and then you tell me something that you’re not, although I have no idea why you did that. Is it some sort of game? is it my turn now? OK... I’m not a blonde

Your turn?

GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M

@newjaninev2 [quote]OK... I’m not a blonde[/quote]

What does being a blonde have to do anything?

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 and... disingenuously deflect, divert, distract, right on schedule.

Suddenly you can’t comprehend a simple point... at the exact moment you see that it’s going to go badly for you.

Let’s pause right here and review:

[quote]Atheists can't ask logical questions being that they're dead in the ground and I'm not religious[/quote]

So you’re still insisting that someone who doesn’t have something that you invent doesn’t exist

...and then you tell me something that you’re not, although I have no idea why you did that. Is it some sort of game? is it my turn now? OK... I’m not a blonde

Your turn?

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GodSpeed63 [quote]What have you been claiming all along in posts, newjaninev?[/quote]

Tell me... or do you need to stick with the cowardice of a vague reference and an indeterminate question?

Kwek00 · 41-45, M

@newjaninev2 It's because he's a troll. No one is this stupid.