WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD? [Spirituality & Religion]

@SW-User
The big bang was “the facts” since the 60s.
Oops Gaia data just contradicted the data and all that Penrose can do is try and disprove it...unsuccessfully.

@Aliveshock Does the big bang has anything to do with the God referred by this post author?

@SW-User Science is like communism; if ideally it is carried out as it was designed it wouldn’t offend. However there are humans involved that contemptuously use it for their own purpose. Sir Roger Penrose is still doing that after his buddy kicked it.

@SW-User no

@Aliveshock [quote] Gaia data just contradicted the data [/quote]
Please explain how the Gaia data contradicts the Big Bang.

@NortiusMaximus
It is on google now.
Look it up!

@Aliveshock I have but I haven't seen anything that supports what you say, quite the opposite in fact. As you must be aware of something I've been unable to find, please provide a link to it.

@SW-User [quote]Science is focused on unearthing facts and it is never bothered about myths. [/quote]

You have yet to show Yahweh is a myth.

@NortiusMaximus
The prediction of the big bang theory was not verified by the data. For a google search you can enter (“big bang” contradictory evidence on speculations by hawking and penrose provided by third round of Gaia data)
I hope my demonstration on how to do a search in google helped!

@GodSpeed63 You yourself had accepted it in the other post!

@Aliveshock [quote]For a google search you can enter (“big bang” contradictory evidence on speculations by hawking and penrose provided by third round of Gaia data)[/quote]
You'll have to do better than that. A Google search using that exact phrase didn't produce anything to support what you said. Everything it found contradicted your claim by supporting the Big Bang theory. To save messing around, just provide a link to the paper that shows how Gaia data disproves the Big Bang.

@NortiusMaximus [quote] To save messing around, just provide a link to the paper that shows how Gaia data disproves the Big Bang.[/quote]
I'm not aware of any such paper myself. A few creationists have made vague claims about Gaia data disproving the Big Bang and proving their god is real but are very short on the specifics.

@SW-User [quote]You yourself had accepted it in the other post![/quote]

Where'd you get idea from? I've never accepted that my God, the one true God, is a myth.

@GodSpeed63 You don't remember the evidence provided to you that you accepted ? Check the comments in your post!

@SW-User [quote]You don't remember the evidence provided to you that you accepted ?[/quote]

There is no evidence shown to me that I've accepted about my God, the one true God, being a myth.

@NortiusMaximus
I will let you try again.
Now I know you are able to google the facts and not just your beliefs in hawking.
“Asiatimes big bang theory”

@GodSpeed63 Evidence is right in front of your nose. I had explained to you in detail and you had accepted it. Read it!

@SW-User He frequently denies knowing anything about that yahweh thing (that he sometimes wrongly calls "the true god") he keeps banging on about. He presents his mere opinion as proven fact yet ignores any real evidence that proves him wrong. It seems he doesn't know what he believes half the time.

@SW-User [quote]Evidence is right in front of your nose.[/quote]

The evidence in front of my nose displays the Work of the true God, Yahweh.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]the Work of the true God, Yahweh.[/quote]
That's an oxymoron. Your made up yahweh thing is not the true god, The Flying Spaghetti Monster is. You've proven that yourself by not proving our Lord FSM doesn't live! r'Amen!

@Aliveshock [quote]I will let you try again.[/quote]
LOL! In fact, I've given you another opportunity to try to present some evidence to support what you said. Why didn't you provide that link in the first place instead of expecting me to do your research for you?

That article (it's not a scientific paper) reads more like sensationalist journalism. Its authors don't even seem to know the difference between a Theory and a hypothesis. I'll give you a clue to start you off. Theories are based on the available evidence. If new evidence is found that the existing theory cannot explain, the theory is modified. If the Gaia data shows the Big Bang theory is wrong we've learned something new. That's the beauty of science, it's not stuck in rigid dogma, having to ignore or dismiss inconvenient facts like religion does.

@NortiusMaximus
I figured you couldn’t benefit from the article.
I had to dig in and find it for you and no it wasn’t speculation but showed how the big bang didn’t have data supporting it at any level. I have to help you of course you reject scientific data. 🙄 Done with you.

@GodSpeed63 Prove it!

@Sharon Yeah,I know. Now he@GodSpeed63himself has proven that his belief was a mere myth. It takes time for him to get in terms with reality.

@SW-User [quote]It takes time for him to get in terms with reality.[/quote]

Yahweh is reality being that He's the Author of it. The only myth I see is evolution which will never be proven.