WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD? [Spirituality & Religion]

@Emosaur For that 1% of the time that he's right about something, you are still going to talk back to him?

@Emosaur What would be the hypothesis and how would the measurement be made? How is science even going to begin to disprove or proof the excistence of annything that just excists in a piece of literature?

If someone makes a claim about a deity, then you can start figuring out if that claim is correct. But that's about it 🤷‍♂️

And even if you disprove that claim, then you still can't go for 100% certaintity that there is no being out there that might defeat our sense of logic and rationality. However, in what form that being might excist, we just don't know, because no claim on God has been proven to be right so far.

It's seriously not the task of Science to disprove God, the task of science is to prove something and if it can't then we can say that thing that was the subject of the research isn't valid

@Emosaur Jup, but now we are getting into specifics.

The reason why Budwick is right, is because he was so smart to be non-specific and stay in the abstract. And since the question results into a "yes" or "no" answer, he had a 50% chance of getting it right.

@Emosaur But his copypaste is pretty simplistic:

Q: WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD?
A: No

If that is all we know... I'm up for it.

@Emosaur Can science disprove God then? How?

@Emosaur Why do you keep going into specifics about abrahamic mythology. I'm talking about Budwicks comment. It just reads:

Q: WILL SCIENCE DISPROVE GOD?
A: No

@Emosaur I guess you never met Azathoth.

@Emosaur Cause it's a God too Emo.
I only agree with Budwick on this one, because he didn't say more then he said. If you just look at his comment, he's right. When you start getting into specifics, he's wrong as ussual. But hey, throw the man a bone, this is the smartest thing he said in weeks... altough for the wrong reasons.

@Emosaur Because I was just looking at his comments.

@Emosaur Yes, we agreed on that part. But I also explained that I was only talking about his comment.

@Emosaur I explained it to you, but you are to stubborn to get it.

@Emosaur I get your point, you just don't get mine.