Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Evolution Scientists vs True Scientists [Spirituality & Religion]

DNA is an incredibly complex information (and language) system. Scientists have only scratched the surface of the complexity of this molecule of heredity. Despite the obvious hallmarks of design, many geneticists attribute DNA to random chance processes over millions of years. But there are many problems with this idea (for example, we never observe information arising from non-information), including the question of why DNA and the code for proteins embedded in DNA evolved “into a nearly uniform blueprint that arose from trillions of possibilities.” Well, a group of researchers are arguing they know the answer. They believe scientists need to expand Darwin’s ideas to include an “energy code”: Darwin's theory of evolution should be expanded to include consideration of a DNA stability "energy code"—so-called "molecular Darwinism"—to further account for the long-term survival of species' characteristics on Earth. The origins of the evolution of the DNA genetic code and the evolution of all living species are embedded in the different energy profiles of their molecular DNA blueprints. Under the influence of the laws of thermodynamics, this energy code evolved, out of an astronomical number of alternative possibilities, into a nearly singular code across all living species. They claim thinking about DNA this way will “provide entirely new ways of analyzing the human genome and the genome of any living species.” AiG’s Dr. Georgia Purdom explains what these researchers mean: Ever since the elucidation of the genetic code, evolutionists have pondered how it came into existence. The genetic code is composed of nucleotide triplets (in DNA and RNA) known as codons. The codons, as their name suggests, code for specific amino acids. For example, the codon CGA codes for the amino acid arginine. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, which are responsible for the structure and function of every living thing. DNA is composed of 4 nucleotides, or bases, abbreviated A, C, T, and G. There are 64 possible combinations of these 4 letters in triplets and there are 20 amino acids. The code is redundant, meaning that multiple codons code for the same amino acid. For example, four codons code for arginine. It’s hard to imagine how something this complex could have evolved by random chance over millions of years, yet that’s exactly what evolutionists have to do! A new study attempted to explain the evolution of the genetic code (called “molecular Darwinism”) by calculating the energy levels of the codons. The conclusion was that the genetic code, “evolved under the influence and regulation of a series of interlocking thermodynamic cycles.” However, what the authors really crafted was a STORY based on the OBSERVATION that some codons have low free energy (are less stable) and some have high free energy (are more stable). The observations may be relevant in understanding certain aspects of the genetic code, but they provide no evidence as to how the genetic code evolved (except in the imagination of the authors!) Researchers continue to propose the preposterous to avoid the truth they know in their hearts but suppress in unrighteousness—that God is the Creator of all life and everything else (see Romans 1).

Evolution scientists see what they want to see in the evidence, true scientists see what is actually there in the evidence.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Yulianna · 22-25, F
i think i might block you, god tells me she already has...
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Yulianna 🤣

You just lost [b]another[/b] debate Yulianna! 🤣
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Kwek00 what?
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Yulianna 🤣
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Kwek00 i give up with you...
Sharon · F
@Yulianna In @GodSpeed63's warped logic, anyone who disagrees with him has automatically lost the debate. It saves him having to present any evidence to support his claims.
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@Sharon yes, i know this...
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon @Yulianna [quote]anyone who disagrees with him has automatically lost the debate. It saves him having to present any evidence to support his claims.[/quote]

It's not me that you're disagreeing with, it's Yahweh. Since you can't prove that He doesn't live, the fact still remains that He does live.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Yulianna Godspeeds' uncanny ability to win debates on this website, is just off the charts 🤣
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 By your logic (or what passes for it), since you can't prove that The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live, the fact still remains that It does live. r'Amen.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon [quote]since you can't prove that The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live, the fact still remains that It does live. r'Amen.[/quote]

Still won't wash. Try again. Amen.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 LOL! I've proven my point. Still waiting for you to offer some evidence to support your claims.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon [quote] I've proven my point.[/quote]

It still doesn't wash. Try again.
This message was deleted by SimilarWorlds staff.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Sharon He's just a troll. The more you feed it, the more it will find itself important. I gave up a while ago.
Sharon · F
@Kwek00 [quote] He's just a troll.[/quote]
I think you're right. He's possibly the most persistent one here.
Carazaa · F
@Sharon [b]Shame on you for being abusive again! Calling people stupid?? Really?? STOP it! People have a right to believe what they want to believe, without being ABUSED! SHAME ON YOU![/b]
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Carazaa Honestly, demanding the right to believe what ever you want to believe, is pretty stupid.
Carazaa · F
@Kwek00 Are you kidding me?? Everyone has a right to their religion!
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Carazaa sure, but demanding the right to believe what ever you want to believe, is pretty stupid. But, well, religion is of course pretty stupid too. No matter what their right is, it's still dumb.
Carazaa · F
@Kwek00 I happen to believe that hating on people is terrible. I believe in Jesus who says to be loving! We should all be loving, and if you disagree with someone then say it but calling people names is hateful!
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Carazaa I kinda think that disliking and speaking against stupidity, is an absolute nescessity for our species to survive in the long run.
Carazaa · F
@Kwek00 You have the right to believe that, sure. You can think whatever, I respect your thoughts and beliefs. But you don't have the right to [b]SAY[/b] whatever, to hurt people. To be abusive. I can think whatever about you, but I shouldn't say it, if it is insulting and critical.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Carazaa I'm not saying what ever. I said what I said. And when it comes to religion, if people wouldn't voice against it, it would just get bigger and bigger and get abusive on everyone else. So I rather have it small, and preferably gone.
Sharon · F
@Carazaa [quote]Shame on you for being abusive again! Calling people stupid??[/quote]
I not being abusive, I'm just telling the truth and trying to help him by letting him know how foolish he's making himself look. Read his replies and see for yourself. I gave a clear example of how, without supporting evidence, his claims for his god can be made for any other god. His reaction was childish to say the least.
Sharon · F
@Carazaa [quote]Are you kidding me?? Everyone has a right to their religion![/quote]
It's a pity christians don't recognize non-christians have that same right!