Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Evolution Scientists vs True Scientists [Spirituality & Religion]

DNA is an incredibly complex information (and language) system. Scientists have only scratched the surface of the complexity of this molecule of heredity. Despite the obvious hallmarks of design, many geneticists attribute DNA to random chance processes over millions of years. But there are many problems with this idea (for example, we never observe information arising from non-information), including the question of why DNA and the code for proteins embedded in DNA evolved “into a nearly uniform blueprint that arose from trillions of possibilities.” Well, a group of researchers are arguing they know the answer. They believe scientists need to expand Darwin’s ideas to include an “energy code”: Darwin's theory of evolution should be expanded to include consideration of a DNA stability "energy code"—so-called "molecular Darwinism"—to further account for the long-term survival of species' characteristics on Earth. The origins of the evolution of the DNA genetic code and the evolution of all living species are embedded in the different energy profiles of their molecular DNA blueprints. Under the influence of the laws of thermodynamics, this energy code evolved, out of an astronomical number of alternative possibilities, into a nearly singular code across all living species. They claim thinking about DNA this way will “provide entirely new ways of analyzing the human genome and the genome of any living species.” AiG’s Dr. Georgia Purdom explains what these researchers mean: Ever since the elucidation of the genetic code, evolutionists have pondered how it came into existence. The genetic code is composed of nucleotide triplets (in DNA and RNA) known as codons. The codons, as their name suggests, code for specific amino acids. For example, the codon CGA codes for the amino acid arginine. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, which are responsible for the structure and function of every living thing. DNA is composed of 4 nucleotides, or bases, abbreviated A, C, T, and G. There are 64 possible combinations of these 4 letters in triplets and there are 20 amino acids. The code is redundant, meaning that multiple codons code for the same amino acid. For example, four codons code for arginine. It’s hard to imagine how something this complex could have evolved by random chance over millions of years, yet that’s exactly what evolutionists have to do! A new study attempted to explain the evolution of the genetic code (called “molecular Darwinism”) by calculating the energy levels of the codons. The conclusion was that the genetic code, “evolved under the influence and regulation of a series of interlocking thermodynamic cycles.” However, what the authors really crafted was a STORY based on the OBSERVATION that some codons have low free energy (are less stable) and some have high free energy (are more stable). The observations may be relevant in understanding certain aspects of the genetic code, but they provide no evidence as to how the genetic code evolved (except in the imagination of the authors!) Researchers continue to propose the preposterous to avoid the truth they know in their hearts but suppress in unrighteousness—that God is the Creator of all life and everything else (see Romans 1).

Evolution scientists see what they want to see in the evidence, true scientists see what is actually there in the evidence.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Sharon · F
[quote]AiG’s Dr. Georgia Purdom explains [/quote]
Why do you avoid saying that "AiG" stands for "Answers in Genesis", a creationists' propaganda website?
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Sharon Do Phd degrees get revoked if a person decides not to worship lies and satanic beliefs?
Sharon · F
@SteelHands [quote]Do Phd degrees get revoked[/quote]
No. As far as I know they're not revoked if a person decides not to worship lies and christian beliefs either, BICBW on that one. What lies and Satanic beliefs are you referring to anyway.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Sharon Bolling calves in their mother's milk is on the list.

There's a long list. You probably do a bunch of them.
Sharon · F
@SteelHands I'm a vegetarian, I don't boil calves in anything. What has that to do with Satanism anyway?
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Sharon Witchcraft is evil. They tell young people witches can be good. That's a lie. Witches are going to hades to be with the father of lies, Satan.
Sharon · F
@SteelHands [quote]Witchcraft is evil.[/quote]
That's just your opinion. Others could say, with equal validity, that christianity is evil. They tell young people christians can be good. That's a lie.

[quote]Witches are going to hades to be with the father of lies, Satan.[/quote]
Witchcraft/Wicca and Satanism are two completely different things. There is no connection between the two whatsoever. You've been listening to lying christian propaganda.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
You're evil for sticking up for them and also acting like it's okay to call all Christianity evil.

It's not.

We're done. You're too evil a person to have anything to say to.
Sharon · F
@SteelHands You're evil for sticking up for christians and thinking it's OK to call Witches and Wicca evil. It's not!

I agree we're done, you're far to evil for decent people to associate with.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur [quote]Christianity promotes slavery, misogyny, and discrimination against disabled people.[/quote]

No one is more blind than those who will not see the Truth of God.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]No one is more blind than those who will not see the Truth of God.[/quote]
That would be you. The "truth of god" is that it's all a lie.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon @Emosaur [quote]Christianity promotes slavery, misogyny, and discrimination against disabled people.[/quote]

You just confirmed what I said is true.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Emosaur [quote]How so?[/quote]

You keep failing to show how Yahweh doesn't live.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]You keep failing to show how Yahweh doesn't live.[/quote]
You keep failing to show how The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live so, [b]by your own argument[/b], you've proven that It does. r'Amen.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon [quote]You keep failing to show how The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live so, by your own argument, you've proven that It does. Amen.[/quote]

You don't believe in it anyways so this post was a waist of your time.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 It doesn't matter whether I believe in The Flying Spaghetti Monster, the fact is you've proven It lives to your own standard of proof. r'Amen.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon [quote]It doesn't matter whether I believe in The Flying Spaghetti Monster,[/quote]

Sure it does. It's not smart to try to get me to disbelieve in your made up god when you don't believe in it in the first place.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 [quote] It's not smart to try to get me to disbelieve in your made up god [/quote]
What made up god? Do you mean that yahweh thing you keep banging on about? I'm not trying to get you to disbelieve in The Flying Spaghetti Monster. You claimed that being unable to prove your made up god ("yahweh") doesn't live is proof that it does. It therefore follows that your inability to prove The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live is proof, [b]to your standard[/b], that It does. Simple logic.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon [quote]The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't live is proof, to your standard, that It does. Simple logic.[/quote]

It's not logic. It's your twisted understanding, Sharon, of the truth I share.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]It's not logic. [/quote]
That's the argument you put forward in respect of your made up yahweh god. You must be applying double standards again.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@Emosaur I can. Though you'll have to imagine it.

Because It's called an imaginary rock and as you know an imaginary thing has no actual substance that can be physically weighed.