This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Jonathan Livingston Seagull
Jonathan Livingston Seagull, written by Richard Bach and illustrated by Russell Munson, is a fable in novella form about a seagull who is trying to learn about life and flight, and a homily about self-perfection. Bach wrote it as a series of short stories that were published in Flying magazine in the late 1960s. It was first published in book form in 1970, and by the end of 1972 over a million copies were in print. Reader's Digest published a condensed version, and the book reached the top of the New York Times Best Seller list, where it remained for 38 weeks. In 1972 and 1973, the book topped the Publishers Weekly list of bestselling novels in the United States.
In 2014 the book was reissued as Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The Complete Edition, which added a 17-page fourth part to the story.
Jonathan Livingston Seagull, written by Richard Bach and illustrated by Russell Munson, is a fable in novella form about a seagull who is trying to learn about life and flight, and a homily about self-perfection. Bach wrote it as a series of short stories that were published in Flying magazine in the late 1960s. It was first published in book form in 1970, and by the end of 1972 over a million copies were in print. Reader's Digest published a condensed version, and the book reached the top of the New York Times Best Seller list, where it remained for 38 weeks. In 1972 and 1973, the book topped the Publishers Weekly list of bestselling novels in the United States.
In 2014 the book was reissued as Jonathan Livingston Seagull: The Complete Edition, which added a 17-page fourth part to the story.
Wraithorn · 51-55, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays I actually agree with this answer. Richard Bach has written some really interesting books.
Another cool one is "Illusions: the adventures of a reluctant messiah".
Another cool one is "Illusions: the adventures of a reluctant messiah".
@Wraithorn [quote]I actually agree with this answer. [/quote]
Why wouldn't you agree? It's a great answer! 🤣
Why wouldn't you agree? It's a great answer! 🤣
Wraithorn · 51-55, M
@FrogManSometimesLooksBothWays Erhmmmm...maybe because it was an unusual answer especially when compared to mainstream religious teachings.