Evoltuion's Big Lie [Spirituality & Religion]

@HerKing [quote]Do you also think dinosaurs roamed around with humans 6000 years ago too?[/quote]

That's what the Word of God says. Yes, I do believe dinosaurs roamed around with humans 6000 years ago.

@GodSpeed63[quote] That's what the Word of God says. Yes, I do believe dinosaurs roamed around with humans 6000 years ago.[/quote]


Can you show me some independent scientific proof to verify your assertion?


Oh, I should add. you can't use 'Because bible'.

@HerKing [quote]Can you show me some independent scientific proof to verify your assertion?[/quote]

Until proven otherwise, The Word of God is the actual Truth and the most reliable ever written being that God, Himself wrote it. I put a video ob here a while back on this very same subject that showed fossils of man and dinosaur prints on the same level of rock formations.

@GodSpeed63 Well you tripped yourself up at the fist hurdle.. There is NOT ONE word in any testament that was written by 'god' Not a one. So proving otherwise is easy because your premise is flawed in the first place.

@HerKing [quote]Well you tripped yourself up at the fist hurdle.. There is NOT ONE word in any testament that was written by 'god' Not a one.[/quote]

Really?

2 Timothy 3 New King James Version (NKJV)
Perilous Times and Perilous Men 3 But know this, that in the last days [a]perilous times will come: 2 For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 unloving, [b]unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, 4 traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away! 6 For of this sort are those who creep into households and make captives of gullible women loaded down with sins, led away by various lusts, 7 always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8 Now as Jannes and Jambres resisted Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, disapproved concerning the faith; 9 but they will progress no further, for their folly will be manifest to all, as theirs also was. 16 All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for [c]instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

2 Peter 1 New King James Version (NKJV)
16 For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty. 17 For He received from God the Father honor and glory when such a voice came to Him from the Excellent Glory: “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.” 18 And we heard this voice which came from heaven when we were with Him on the holy mountain. 19 [i]And so we have the prophetic word confirmed, which you do well to heed as a light that shines in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts; 20 knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private [j]interpretation, 21 for prophecy never came by the will of man, but [k]holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

God is not a man that He is capable of lying or being in error.

@GodSpeed63 Because bible doesn't count. I said that.

@HerKing [quote]Because bible doesn't count. I said that.[/quote]

The Lord God has the final Word, not you.

@GodSpeed63 I think you'll find you're so fucking wrong...wronger than a wrong thing.. Now again...

Which words were specifically written by your 'god' in the bible... Specifically. With a pencil, quill, scraped on a stone, typewriter, whatever...

@GodSpeed63 Is the world also flat, by any chance???

@GodSpeed63 He hasnt met my wife.

@GodSpeed63 [quote]I put a video ob here a while back[/quote]

and that ridiculous video was thoroughly and soundly shown to be absolute piffle.

Would you like to go back over that? I’d [i]love[/i] to do so!

@newjaninev2 [quote]and that ridiculous video was thoroughly and soundly shown to be absolute piffle.[/quote]

How's that? Explain, will you?

@newjaninev2 [quote]Would you like to go back over that? I’d love to do so!
[/quote]

Looks like you got your wish...

@HootyTheNightOwl Yes... excellent.

I’ll sleep now, and deal (once again) with that duplicitous video when I wake

@newjaninev2 [quote]https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mutations/towards-a-creationary-classification-of-mutations/[/quote]

Have a good sleep. When you wake, you can read this also.

[image=https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/mutations/towards-a-creationary-classification-of-mutations/]

@GodSpeed63 "Mutations are normally classified according to their proximal effect on an organism’s fitness, whether beneficial, deleterious, or neutral"

No they’re not! Who’s making up this tripe? How could a mutation be thus classified when its effects are unknown... such a classification would presuppose total knowledge of the effects of the mutation[i] in the future.[/I]

Right there the entire nonsense fails.

Then it’s followed by nonsense after nonsense... all of which seem to be written with a gullible reader in mind.

"the pattern expected by the genome’s architecture”

Pattern?
Expected? Expected by whom?
Genome’s architecture... meaningless!

I cannot read his entire splurge... it’s the occasional reference to a research paper from the literature, but twisted to purpose, with gratuitous and duplicitous reference to creationist claims woven around them.

I’ve seen this sort of duplicity before... it’s disgusting.

@GodSpeed63 The funny part really starts in the first paragraph of 'Guidelines for Determining Second-Order Classification’.

Just now it had a coffee-room of biologists roaring with laughter!

As one said: ‘pretentious cherry-picking bullshit’

@GodSpeed63 Incidentally, thank you for 'the current literature of both creationists and evolutionists’

That had us all rolling in the aisles!

@newjaninev2 [quote]The nucleotide mutation that isn’t going to go away.[/quote]

You're welcome. Evolution is the silliest thing I've ever heard of. It'd probably have me rolling in the aisles as well.

@GodSpeed63 Incidentally, you neglected to supply a literature citation for that ridiculous article.

It was published, wasn’t it? Subjected to peer review?

@newjaninev2 [quote]It was published, wasn’t it? Subjected to peer review?[/quote]

So?

@GodSpeed63 So, not published in the literature? Not subjected to peer review?

Just an opinion piece?

Dismissed... please don’t waste my time in that manner.

@GodSpeed63 Do you imagine there was a mating pair of T-Rexes on the Ark?

@redredred [quote]Do you imagine there was a mating pair of T-Rexes on the Ark?[/quote]

I do not imagine, I know there were dinosaurs on the Ark and, like every other meat eating animal, God shut their mouths and sustained them.

@GodSpeed63 [quote] I know there were dinosaurs on the Ark [/quote]

YOU KNOW??