Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Science Really Does Point To God [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t60MBskbNuc] No Question About It.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Science also supports the idea of the multiverse therefore any existence is possible there for in some universe there is possibly a god albeit this or the next
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@TheMidwesternWayToValhalla Science does not support a multiverse. Some scientists realize that there is insufficient causation for life as we know it so instead of using comet tails as the source of life on earth to simply making an infinite number of universes to cover the impossibility of abiogenesis. Kind of funny when you think about it. Deny the obvious (intelligent design) and claim the silly (multiverse). And you wonder why people don't take big science seriously.
@hippyjoe1955 im a pagan I do you don’t need to tell me twice about intelligent design but don’t dismiss something you apparently don’t understand because you just discovered something you found some sense in and called it a day.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2018-05-death-hawking-multiverse-theory-size.amp
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@TheMidwesternWayToValhalla Wouldn't do me any good to tell you anything. You aren't bright enough to understand any of it anyways. Nice of you to play along though.
CookieLuvsBunny · 31-35, F
@hippyjoe1955

[quote] And you wonder why people don't take big science seriously.[/quote]

That is crazy on a level that cannot be dealt with on this site
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@CookieLuvsBunny so you believe all those "studies" the media trots out on a daily basis? Says a lot about your intellect. Maybe you should just back away from your computer before you have a brain freeze.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@hippyjoe1955 except it's not the media, it's peer reviewed journals, reviewed by other qualified scientists.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
There is absolutely no experimental scientific evidence for the multi-verse@TheMidwesternWayToValhalla
CookieLuvsBunny · 31-35, F
@Speedyman
Evidence for anything outside of our universe is not possible
@hippyjoe1955 that’s what every person who can’t cantinue a valid argument says. Nice try though buddy
@Speedyman congratulations on figuring out what a theory is
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Interesting our friend Richard Dawkins who sets on other things that you must always accept things according to their scientific evidence because he believes in the multi-verse@CookieLuvsBunny
Speedyman · 70-79, M
@TheMidwesternWayToValhalla my dear ignorant little friend, I was figuring them our long before you made your belated appearance in the world
CookieLuvsBunny · 31-35, F
@Speedyman
Dawkins believes in a multiverse concept but it is only his personal belief or opinion. Neither he nor I would claim any such concept as being scientific
@Speedyman don’t expect to be taken seriously if your only back up is using an ad hominem and ad ignorantiam. Age doesn’t define intelligence
Speedyman · 70-79, M
With you lack of age certainly doesn't! 😄@TheMidwesternWayToValhalla
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@CookieLuvsBunny I should also point out that multiverse is not even accepted by most scientists and there are scientists that question inflation, deeming it unfalsifiable, so I have no idea why he's acting as if this is accepted science.
CookieLuvsBunny · 31-35, F
@basilfawlty89
You are correct. Any theories about anything outside of our universe, e.g., a multiverse, is a statement of faith and not science