Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Religious people: How do you know your religion is the correct one? [Spirituality & Religion]

There are loads of different religions and each of them has belief systems which are mutually incompatible. There are different sects within each religion and different interpretations of all religious texts. Why is it for example, that an American born in the Bible Belt 'happens' to be part of the chosen people by God? I guess someone born in China or the Middle-East is just out of luck when it comes to St Peter's judgement. Why is it that British Christians are largely tolerant of abortion, yet American Christians see it as murdering babies? I accept there are scientific arguments for that but I'm looking here at the cultural reasons why groups of people believe what they do.

I have respect for religious people who are tolerant of others. If you accept other people's right to have opinions and that you might not have all the answers then that is OK. What I don't get is the highly religious people who make consequential decisions affecting others (personal and political) based on their belief in God. I also hate how religion often is used as a justification for the persecution or intolerance of others.

If anyone thinks 'God spoke to me' counts as proof, then you need to explain why God tells different people different things.

-The Onion, January 1, 2000

[quote][b][u][big][center]Christian Right Ascends To Heaven[/center][/big][/u][/b]

TULSA, OK -- At the stroke of midnight, Jan. 1, 2000, the clouds opened above the Bible Belt and a golden staircase appeared for all born-again Christians who do not bear the Mark of the Beast to ascend into Heaven and enjoy Everlasting Salvation.

Night turned to day as Jesus Christ appeared at the top of the staircase in a blinding white sun-beam to select only 1,000 believers for ascension into Heaven, as outlined in the Book of Revelation.

"Follow Me," the bearded, unkempt Jew told His assembled flock as He unrolled a papyrus scroll bearing a list of names. The list was a veritable Who's Who of the Christian Right. "Pat Buchanan, Bob Dornan, Jerry Falwell, Fred Phelps, Ralph Reed, Trent Lott..." Jesus read on, as those named followed Him into the clouds.

Millionaire cable-TV executive and right-wing politician Pat Robertson smiled gleefully as he slowly climbed the stairs. "I've been waiting for this moment all my life," he said, his three-piece suit shimmering in the beatific glare.

"I am going to a place where everybody is like me, filled with Christian love and understanding," said conservative talk-show host and two-time presidential candidate Buchanan. "There will also be a shared hatred of gays."

Sources close to Jesus say He and Buchanan will meet privately later this week to discuss a gay-killing meteor, which could smite the Earth's wicked Sodomites by as early as 2002.

"Remember, Jesus loves you," said Christ, waving from atop the golden staircase, flanked by Robertson, Buchanan and Falwell, who also waved down to the damned. "So long, suckers!" Falwell exclaimed.

Noted astronomer and atheist Carl Sagan, whose skull is now the drinking gourd of Satan, spoke from the fourth level of Hell, saying, "Save me, Jesus. I was wrong to value scientific reasoning over divine faith. Please, take me with you."

The chosen Christians are expected to enjoy an eternity of worshipping God and singing hymns in Heaven. "I expect it will be a great deal like being in Sunday service, except it will never end," Robertson said. "I am very excited about it."[/quote]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
If it feels correct to you, then it's the correct one to follow at that stage in your life.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@HootyTheNightOwl But different ideologies "feel correct" to different people. They can't all be right.
@BlueVeins I don't care what others are doing, though... I can only worry about myself and my spiritual development. If we are each in the faith that feels best fit to us, then we will each be working to better this world for our fellow men, which can't be a bad thing.
SW-User
@BlueVeins they're not but it's what helps them get through life I guess
BlueVeins · 22-25
@HootyTheNightOwl But that means at least one of the two people is incorrect, and one of the people's efforts will be poisoned by false information.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SW-User But what about the truth? Don't you think everyone deserves to know the truth?
@BlueVeins What if we are all incorrect??? All we have as "evidence" of many faiths is a book that was written many years after the events happened - and even the "experts" can't claim to have a full understanding of any religious texts - so it's possible that we could have the basics right and have inaccuracies in other details.

If the time comes and you find yourself standing before God, is it better to say "I tried my best, Father" or "I was too busy trying to figure out which faith was the one true faith, Father"???
SW-User
@BlueVeins nobody knows the truth.. if we did so many different religions wouldn't exist
BlueVeins · 22-25
@HootyTheNightOwl Every religious book being incorrect would not make us all incorrect... only most of us. But that's besides the point. Your argument is an argument from consequences; if we perform a rational analysis of our situation and find that the answer is inconvenient to us at the time, the right course of action isn't to decide that such analysis should not take place. It's to accept that answer and in so doing, grow as people.

As for the Pascal's Wager argument, it doesn't really work in an indeterminite world. Among other issues, every possible post-death consequence has an opposite to cancel it out. In example, it's possible that all non-Christians will suffer perpetually sure, but it's also possible that the reverse will happen instead. It makes no difference.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SW-User Not in a strictly solipsistic sense, no. Some "possibilities" can reasonably be ruled out based on scientific evidence and philosophical arguments, some of which people still follow anyway.
SW-User
@BlueVeins If you're gonna talk about science then all religions can be ruled out
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SW-User I'm not sure about [i]all[/i] of them. Religions that make no physical claims could have a shot, although I'll admit there are hardly any.
SW-User
@BlueVeins exactly
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@BlueVeins Science has not proven religion so there's no info to be poisoned. Religion is abstract because it's a reflection of the person itself and so religion changes according to majority popular opinion, this is why religious texts and religious Govts throughout history tended to change so much.

So religion is incorrect and true at the same time as religion has always been in the mind.
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SatanBurger Religion makes several claims about the way it actually is, though. If you believe religion only exists in people's minds -- a conclusion with which I tend to agree -- that makes it false because its followers believe the opposite.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@BlueVeins Well if someone really wanted to believe a deity existed I suppose you can go the far out way and just theorize there's parallel universes so your God could exist in one lol 😂